Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Ethnography of Ulur-ulur Tulungagung Ritual and the Disconnected Memory

ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 130–140

DOI
10.31947/etnosia.v7i2.22141
ISSN
2548-9747, 2527-9319
Terbit
2022-10-17
Penerbit
Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University.
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

This research aims to elucidate the reason behind the decline of villagers’ enthusiasm toward the Ulur-ulur ritual. Ulur-ulur ritual is a surviving agrarian ritual that was initially an integral part of and executed by four villages, including the Village of Sawo, Ngentrong, Gedangan, and Gamping Tulungagung Regency, as a manifestation of gratitude for the water of Buret Lake sustaining local’s agricultural activity. Historically, this ritual was dying in 1965, then revitalized in 1966 by the Paguyuban Sendang Tirto Mulyo. Currently, despite being set as the annual agenda of Tulungagung Tourism and officially acknowledged as an intangible cultural heritage by the Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia in 2020, the villagers' enthusiasm remains low. To uncover this phenomenon, this research employed an ethnographic approach. In-depth interviews and participatory research were executed to obtain data. The result showed that the ritual was constructed and operated by two memories: dhanyangan (ancestral spirit) and agricultural memories. However, the impact of the G-30-S tragedy escalated the tension in the society leading to the vandalism of the Sri-Sedono statues, which were the mnemonic device of agricultural memory. Meanwhile, the dhanyangan memory, constantly amplifying, created a clash with the more religious society’s narrative. The long vacuum period and the narrative shift make the association of ritual with the dhanyangan grow more robust, which contradicts the current social context. Furthermore, the revitalization, which was merely rooted in “defeated memory” led to the exclusion of the ritual from society.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

12 penulis · 32 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Jude William GeniloUniversity of Liberal Arts Bangladesh1
Drina IntyaswatiUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta1
Irpan Ripai SutowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anter VenusAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
S. Bekti IstiyantoJenderal Soedirman University1
Edi SantosoJenderal Soedirman University1
Nuryanti NuryantiJenderal Soedirman University1
Mite SetiansahJenderal Soedirman University1
Irna HardiyantiJenderal Soedirman University1
Anuar AliUniversiti Teknologi MARA1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/etnosia/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Ethnography of Ulur-ulur Tulungagung Ritual and the Disconnected Memory</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ayuningtyas, Fitria</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hakim, Luqman</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Agrarian</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ritual</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Disconnected Memory</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ethnographic</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This research aims to elucidate the reason behind the decline of villagers’ enthusiasm toward the Ulur-ulur  ritual. Ulur-ulur ritual is a surviving agrarian ritual that was initially an integral part of and executed by four villages, including the Village of Sawo, Ngentrong, Gedangan, and Gamping Tulungagung Regency, as a manifestation of gratitude for the water of Buret Lake sustaining local’s agricultural activity. Historically, this ritual was dying in 1965, then revitalized in 1966 by the Paguyuban Sendang Tirto Mulyo. Currently, despite being set as the annual agenda of Tulungagung Tourism and officially acknowledged as an intangible cultural heritage by the Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia in 2020, the villagers' enthusiasm remains low. To uncover this phenomenon, this research employed an ethnographic approach. In-depth interviews and participatory research were executed to obtain data. The result showed that the ritual was constructed and operated by two memories: dhanyangan (ancestral spirit) and agricultural memories. However, the impact of the G-30-S tragedy escalated the tension in the society leading to the vandalism of the Sri-Sedono statues, which were the mnemonic device of agricultural memory. Meanwhile, the dhanyangan memory, constantly amplifying, created a clash with the more religious society’s narrative. The long vacuum period and the narrative shift make the association of ritual with the dhanyangan grow more robust, which contradicts the current social context. Furthermore, the revitalization, which was merely rooted in “defeated memory” led to the exclusion of the ritual from society. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University.</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-10-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/etnosia/article/view/22141</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.31947/etnosia.v7i2.22141</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022); 130 - 140</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-9747</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2527-9319</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.31947/etnosia.v7i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/etnosia/article/view/22141/8749</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>