Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

From voluntary private to mandatory state governance in Indonesian forest certification: Reclaiming authority by bureaucracies

Forest and Society · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 28–46

DOI
10.24259/fs.v2i1.3164
ISSN
2549-4333, 2549-4724
Published
2018-04-26
Publisher
Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Forest certification has been introduced by non-state actors as a voluntary and market-based instrument addressing forest problems, which state policies failed to resolve. Lately, however, state-driven forest-related certification schemes can be observed, e.g. in Indonesia, through the EU FLEGT-VPA negotiation process. It is argued, specific state agencies in a struggle for power and authority develop mandatory certification schemes which are directly competing with private ones. Before this background, the aims of this study are: (i) describing the current trend from voluntary private to mandatory state certification schemes in Indonesia, (ii) mapping the main actors involved in certification politics, and (iii) explaining this trend with the interests of the main actors. The results confirm a trend from voluntary private to mandatory state-driven certification of forest management. The Ministry of Forestry, the Ministry of Trade, the Ministry of Industry, wood producer and processing associations, European Union, local funding organizations, environmental organizations, certification bodies and international buyers are detected as the main coalitions and actors in the certification politics. The stronger coalition develops a mandatorily-timber legality verification system as strategies to counter their voluntary private competitor schemes.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 104 co-authorship links · 4 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Gunadarma University
  • Jamia Millia Islamia
  • UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ichwan SuyudiGunadarma University2
Ahmad MaryudiAffiliation unknown2
Carsten SchusserAffiliation unknown2
Reni Diah KusumawatiAffiliation unknown1
Diana IkasariAffiliation unknown1
Irfan HumainiAffiliation unknown1
Himanshu DuttJamia Millia Islamia1
Luthfi Chanafiah PashaGunadarma University1
SF. Luthfie Arguby PurnomoUIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta1
Hendro FirmawanGunadarma University1
Ahmad Juma KhatibAffiliation unknown1
Putri PermatasariAffiliation unknown1
Suwarto SuwartoAffiliation unknown1
Joko WinarnoAffiliation unknown1
Sapja AnantanyuAffiliation unknown1
Suryono SuryonoAffiliation unknown1
Widiyanto WidiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Erlin Dara PravitasariAffiliation unknown1
Erysa NimastutiAffiliation unknown1
Eny LestariAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Lutfhfi NugrahaAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Azis FirdausAffiliation unknown1
Titing SuhartiAffiliation unknown1
Dhea Firna AnandaAffiliation unknown1
Bekti Wahyu UtamiAffiliation unknown1
Suminah SuminahAffiliation unknown1
Naufal Rastra ShubhiAffiliation unknown1
Swati NegiAffiliation unknown1
Micah R. FisherAffiliation unknown1
Dwi LaraswatiAffiliation unknown1
Max KrottAffiliation unknown1
Emma SorayaAffiliation unknown1
Sari RahayuAffiliation unknown1
Md Faisal Abedin Khan KhanAffiliation unknown1
Md Saifur RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Lwin Thuzar NyeinAffiliation unknown1
Daniel KartheAffiliation unknown1
Mukand Singh BabelAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">From voluntary private to mandatory state governance in Indonesian forest certification: Reclaiming authority by bureaucracies</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wibowo, Agung</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Giessen, Lukas</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">competition</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest certification</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">private governance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">state governance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">bureaucratic politics</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Forest certification has been introduced by non-state actors as a voluntary and market-based instrument addressing forest problems, which state policies failed to resolve. Lately, however, state-driven forest-related certification schemes can be observed, e.g. in Indonesia, through the EU FLEGT-VPA negotiation process. It is argued, specific state agencies in a struggle for power and authority develop mandatory certification schemes which are directly competing with private ones. Before this background, the aims of this study are: (i) describing the current trend from voluntary private to mandatory state certification schemes in Indonesia, (ii) mapping the main actors involved in certification politics, and (iii) explaining this trend with the interests of the main actors. The results confirm a trend from voluntary private to mandatory state-driven certification of forest management. The Ministry of Forestry, the Ministry of Trade, the Ministry of Industry, wood producer and processing associations, European Union, local funding organizations, environmental organizations, certification bodies and international buyers are detected as the main coalitions and actors in the certification politics. The stronger coalition develops a mandatorily-timber legality verification system as strategies to counter their voluntary private competitor schemes.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-04-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/3164</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24259/fs.v2i1.3164</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Forest and Society; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): APRIL; 28-46</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4333</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4724</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/3164/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2019 Forest and Society</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>