Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Bridging social forestry and forest management units: Juxtaposing policy imaginaries with implementation practices in a case from Sulawesi

Forest and Society · Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019) · hlm. 97–113

DOI
10.24259/fs.v3i1.6049
ISSN
2549-4333, 2549-4724
Terbit
2019-04-23
Penerbit
Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

As the priority forestry development programs in Indonesia in recent years, Social Forestry policies (SF) and Forest Management Units (FMU or KPH) still indicate low performance. The SF program in particular, is dependent on the role of the KPH as an institution in realizing its expected goals. Using the theory of bureaucratic politics, this article presents the implementation of the SF program under the KPH system and how both programs can mutually support or inhibit the development of the other. The research was conducted using policy content analysis in the implementation of SF and KPH programs by applying interview methods, questionnaires and field observations that are presented both qualitatively and descriptively. We find that the development of SF cannot be separated from the role of the KPH bureaucracy due to the absence of bureaucratic institutions at the site level. SF sites are located in KPH working areas and perform a central role in all aspects of SF management. However, SF programs are not clearly stated as one of the main tasks and functions of KPHs and the existence of KPH interests in realizing independence without special budget allocations for the development of SF are obstacles to its implementation. KPH also still face regulatory issues that have not fully supported KPH operations resulting in weak institutions and independence to governing hierarchies due to the strong influence of the bureaucracy at the central and provincial levels. On the other hand, the SF program is still perceived as a rival of KPHs in forest management areas and further suffer from rigid regulations that are difficult to apply, making it challenging for SF to support the objectives of KPH programming. Under these conditions, KPH tend to limit SF schemes, thus privileging specific different forestry partnership schemes that are anticipated to support the independence of the KPH.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 81 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 10 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
  • Muhammadiyah University of Makassar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Makkarennu MakkarennuAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Muhammad Alif K SahideAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Emban Ibnurusyd Mas'udAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Nurhady SirimorokAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Taufik TaufikUniversitas Airlangga2
Abd. Rahman SalehUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare2
Usnul LetariUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare2
Irma IrmaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare2
Rosmawaty RosmawatyAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Anas NikoyanUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Muhammad SyarifAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rosnawintang RosnawintangAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Syamsir NurAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fahria Nadiryati SadimantaraUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Ilyas IlyasSTKIP Taman Siswa Bima2
Adrayanti SabarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rahmadanih RahmadanihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
M.Saleh S. AliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Imam Mujahidin FahmidAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sawedi MuhammadAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Salsa Rizkia MeilindaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nurhikmah NurhikmahUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Rosmiati RamliUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare1
Andi Fitriani DjollongUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare1
Sri YulistikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad TahnurMuhammadiyah University of Makassar1
Bakri BakriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
La Ode Agus Salim MandoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus SetiawanUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muh. DassirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Apoda ApodaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti KadarimaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Asriani AsrianiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Wa Ode Rachmasari ArianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rafika Dewi PratiwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yusril YusrilAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Bridging social forestry and forest management  units: Juxtaposing policy imaginaries with implementation practices in a case from Sulawesi</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Tajuddin, Tajuddin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Supratman, Supratman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Salman, Darmawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yusran, Yusran</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Forest Management Units (FMU)</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social Forestry</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">bureaucratic politics</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">As the priority forestry development programs in Indonesia in recent years, Social Forestry policies (SF) and Forest Management Units (FMU or KPH) still indicate low performance. The SF program in particular, is dependent on the role of the KPH as an institution in realizing its expected goals. Using the theory of bureaucratic politics, this article presents the implementation of the SF program under the KPH system and how both programs can mutually support or inhibit the development of the other. The research was conducted using policy content analysis in the implementation of SF and KPH programs by applying interview methods, questionnaires and field observations that are presented both qualitatively and descriptively. We find that the development of SF cannot be separated from the role of the KPH bureaucracy due to the absence of bureaucratic institutions at the site level. SF sites are located in KPH working areas and perform a central role in all aspects of SF management. However, SF programs are not clearly stated as one of the main tasks and functions of KPHs and the existence of KPH interests in realizing independence without special budget allocations for the development of SF are obstacles to its implementation. KPH also still face regulatory issues that have not fully supported KPH operations resulting in weak institutions and independence to governing hierarchies due to the strong influence of the bureaucracy at the central and provincial levels. On the other hand, the SF program is still perceived as a rival of KPHs in forest management areas and further suffer from rigid regulations that are difficult to apply, making it challenging for SF to support the objectives of KPH programming. Under these conditions, KPH tend to limit SF schemes, thus privileging specific different forestry partnership schemes that are anticipated to support the independence of the KPH.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-04-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/6049</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24259/fs.v3i1.6049</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Forest and Society; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): APRIL; 97-113</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4333</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4724</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/6049/5922</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/6049/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2019 Forest and Society</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>