Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

The power in the interview: A practical guide for identifying the critical role of actor interests in environment research

Forest and Society · Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020) · pp. 142–150

DOI
10.24259/fs.v4i1.9132
ISSN
2549-4333, 2549-4724
Published
2020-04-26
Publisher
Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

In policy discussions of sensitive and complex issues, particularly in the field of forestry and natural resources, interests play an integral role, but are often a challenging component to contextualize, understand, and study. For various reasons related to factors of influence and authority, actors often do not want their interests uncovered by either competitors or even by non-partisan researchers. Nevertheless, identifying such interests continue to be a critical task for the research community, particularly if we are to better understand the broader effects, effectiveness, or shortcomings of policy. In this short policy brief, we provide a practical guide for researchers to capture and incorporate actor interests as part of their empirical evidence through the interview process. Following an empirical-analytical approach, we first distinguish interests of two different types, the formal and informal. Thereafter, our guide lays out an approach consisting of four distinct phases, namely: i) deciding on the interview format, ii) creating situational settings for the interview, iii) preparing interview guides; and iv) triangulating the interview. In each phase, we underline the importance of a culture of generosity and positivity directed toward the interviewees, comfortably engaging them to describe factors and scenarios in rich detail, while also encouraging respondents to express their values and feelings toward both the area of study and other actors across policy networks.Actor interests are always a sensitive issue in policies related to the environment, which are often purposefully hidden by actors, and commonly overlooked by research;We develop a practical guide based on a set of principles for researchers to use when approaching interviews, which will help to more effectively understand and contextualize actor interests, and can ensure more robust findings about policies related to the environment and natural resources;This guide lays out four distinct phases for approaching the complex and sensitive issue of actor interests for data collection using interviews, namely through the way researchers i) structure interview formats, ii) set up situational settings, iii) approach the preparation and delivery of guiding questions, and iv) triangulate the interview.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 116 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Mataram
  • Padjadjaran University
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Muhammad Alif K SahideAffiliation unknown10
Nurhady SirimorokAffiliation unknown6
Bart VerheijenAffiliation unknown4
Karno BatiranAffiliation unknown3
Yubelince Y. RuntuboiAffiliation unknown3
Lukas GiessenAffiliation unknown3
Dwi LaraswatiAffiliation unknown3
San Afri AwangAffiliation unknown2
Setiadi SetiadiUniversity of Mataram2
Arsad RagandhiAffiliation unknown2
Agus Heruanto HadnaAffiliation unknown2
Fitria Dewi SusantiAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Haidar DaulayAffiliation unknown2
Eka WulandariPadjadjaran University2
Aprisep Ferdhana KusumaAffiliation unknown2
Ema IsmarianaAffiliation unknown2
Widodo Budi SantosoAffiliation unknown2
Max KrottAffiliation unknown2
Emma SorayaAffiliation unknown2
Sari RahayuAffiliation unknown2
Suprapto SupraptoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Wahyu WardhanaAffiliation unknown1
Micah FisherAffiliation unknown1
Sukanlaya ChoenkwanAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad DhiaulhaqAffiliation unknown1
Pham Thu ThuyAffiliation unknown1
Ngo Ha ChauAffiliation unknown1
Dao Thi Linh ChiAffiliation unknown1
Hoang Tuan LongAffiliation unknown1
Dwiko B. PermadiAffiliation unknown1
Mei MeilaniAffiliation unknown1
Wahyu AndayaniAffiliation unknown1
Lies Rahayu Wijayanti FaidaAffiliation unknown1
Rodd MyersAffiliation unknown1
Arnanto NurprabowoAffiliation unknown1
Sigit HardwinartoAffiliation unknown1
Budi DharmawanAffiliation unknown1
Djati MardiatnoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The power in the interview: A practical guide for identifying the critical role of actor interests in environment research</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Maryudi, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fisher, Micah R.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">critical policy analysis</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">actor interests</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">power</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">qualitative interview</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest policy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest governance</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">In policy discussions of sensitive and complex issues, particularly in the field of forestry and natural resources, interests play an integral role, but are often a challenging component to contextualize, understand, and study. For various reasons related to factors of influence and authority, actors often do not want their interests uncovered by either competitors or even by non-partisan researchers. Nevertheless, identifying such interests continue to be a critical task for the research community, particularly if we are to better understand the broader effects, effectiveness, or shortcomings of policy. In this short policy brief, we provide a practical guide for researchers to capture and incorporate actor interests as part of their empirical evidence through the interview process. Following an empirical-analytical approach, we first distinguish interests of two different types, the formal and informal. Thereafter, our guide lays out an approach consisting of four distinct phases, namely: i) deciding on the interview format, ii) creating situational settings for the interview, iii) preparing interview guides; and iv) triangulating the interview. In each phase, we underline the importance of a culture of generosity and positivity directed toward the interviewees, comfortably engaging them to describe factors and scenarios in rich detail, while also encouraging respondents to express their values and feelings toward both the area of study and other actors across policy networks.Actor interests are always a sensitive issue in policies related to the environment, which are often purposefully hidden by actors, and commonly overlooked by research;We develop a practical guide based on a set of principles for researchers to use when approaching interviews, which will help to more effectively understand and contextualize actor interests, and can ensure more robust findings about policies related to the environment and natural resources;This guide lays out four distinct phases for approaching the complex and sensitive issue of actor interests for data collection using interviews, namely through the way researchers i) structure interview formats, ii) set up situational settings, iii) approach the preparation and delivery of guiding questions, and iv) triangulate the interview.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-04-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/9132</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24259/fs.v4i1.9132</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Forest and Society; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): APRIL; 142-150</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4333</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4724</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/9132/5902</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/9132/5762</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2020 Forest and Society</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>