Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

Indicators to Evaluate the Institutional Effectiveness of National Climate Financing Mechanisms

Forest and Society · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020) · pp. 358–378

DOI
10.24259/fs.v4i2.10309
ISSN
2549-4333, 2549-4724
Published
2020-10-22
Publisher
Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Over the past few decades, tackling climate change has persistently featured in international discussions, with the main issues centring on mobilising adequate global response and effectively coordinating and channelling this response at the sub-national levels. In order to effectively mobilize and harmonize resources to address climate change at country level, the idea of establishing national climate finance institutions (NCFIs) with the duty to mobilise, manage and allocate funds to implement climate change actions has gained prominence among developing countries. This study develops an indicator-based framework to evaluate the institutional effectiveness of the Indonesian Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF) as a case study. Building on previous frameworks and principles of climate finance, a total of 21 indicators were identified, these indicators were categorized into five effectiveness components, which are: were identified, and these indicators were categorized into five effectiveness components, which include: legal and regulatory framework, fund mobilization and sustainability, fund management and allocation, monitoring and evaluation, and transparency and accountability. We find that the major and fundamental weakness of the ICCTF is its inability to adequately mobilize funds, while its strength is in management and allocation of available resources. Inclusion of the legal and regulatory framework component, which has been largely absent in previous studies, further enabled us to identify critical legal gaps in the operationalization of the ICCTF. While the current legal foundation of the ICCTF ensures transparency and accountability, it significantly constrains the ICCTFs flexibility and innovative potentials.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

21 authors · 72 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • IPB University
  • Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Arif SatriaIPB University1
Rizaldi BoerAffiliation unknown1
Tabah Arif RahmaniAffiliation unknown1
Yulius HeroAffiliation unknown1
Mi Sun ParkAffiliation unknown1
Hariadi KartodihardjoAffiliation unknown1
Handian PurwawangsaAffiliation unknown1
Ernan RustiadiAffiliation unknown1
Suryanto SuryantoJenderal Soedirman University1
Suria Darma TariganAffiliation unknown1
Irdika MansurAffiliation unknown1
Agus WahyudiAffiliation unknown1
Iskandar Zulkarnaen SiregarAffiliation unknown1
Ishak YassirAffiliation unknown1
Mangarah SilalahiAffiliation unknown1
Rhett D. HarissonAffiliation unknown1
Lutfy AbdulahAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Indicators to Evaluate the Institutional Effectiveness of National Climate Financing Mechanisms</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sheriffdeen, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nurrochmat, Dodik Ridho</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Perdinan, Perdinan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Di Gregorio, Monica </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Climate governance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">policy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">trust funds</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">finance readiness</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">ICCTF</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Over the past few decades, tackling climate change has persistently featured in international discussions, with the main issues centring on mobilising adequate global response and effectively coordinating and channelling this response at the sub-national levels. In order to effectively mobilize and harmonize resources to address climate change at country level, the idea of establishing national climate finance institutions (NCFIs) with the duty to mobilise, manage and allocate funds to implement climate change actions has gained prominence among developing countries. This study develops an indicator-based framework to evaluate the institutional effectiveness of the Indonesian Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF) as a case study. Building on previous frameworks and principles of climate finance, a total of 21 indicators were identified, these indicators were categorized into five effectiveness components, which are: were identified, and these indicators were categorized into five effectiveness components, which include: legal and regulatory framework, fund mobilization and sustainability, fund management and allocation, monitoring and evaluation, and transparency and accountability. We find that the major and fundamental weakness of the ICCTF is its inability to adequately mobilize funds, while its strength is in management and allocation of available resources.  Inclusion of the legal and regulatory framework component, which has been largely absent in previous studies, further enabled us to identify critical legal gaps in the operationalization of the ICCTF. While the current legal foundation of the ICCTF ensures transparency and accountability, it significantly constrains the ICCTFs flexibility and innovative potentials.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-10-22</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Research article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/10309</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24259/fs.v4i2.10309</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Forest and Society; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): NOVEMBER; 358-378</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4333</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4724</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/10309/5975</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2020 Forest and Society</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>