Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

Injustice against Women in a Social Forestry Program: Case Studies from Two Indonesian Villages

Forest and Society · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022) · pp. 723–741

DOI
10.24259/fs.v6i2.20006
ISSN
2549-4333, 2549-4724
Published
2022-11-03
Publisher
Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Social forestry programs, aimed to reduce poverty in forest communities while maintaining the forest function, are increasingly incorporating gender issues and responsiveness. By design, social forestry program is supposed to promote justice and equality for forest users, but on the ground discriminatory practices against women are occurring. Drawing case study from two Indonesian villages, this study examined the extent of discrimination against women in the implementation of the state social forestry programs. In-depth interviews, observations, and focused group discussions were conducted to collect the data from the villages to analyze the extent of discriminatory practices by using a social justice framework with a three-dimensional approach, namely recognition, representation, and participation, as well as distribution. This study found that women were not recognized as the primary users of forest land (not considered as farmers), low representation and participation of women in the Social Forestry Groups, and unequal distribution of benefits between women and men in obtaining assistance and participation in training for capacity building. Furthermore, gender based discrimination and inequality in social forestry are influenced by local social constructions in the form of patriarchal culture and religious belief. Finally, discrimination against women can take place even in state programs designed to bring justice in the context of joint forestry management, and the formal programs with a degree of gender responsive elements can be succumbed to biased local informal institutions and beliefs.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 138 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sahta GintingUniversitas Halu Oleo7
Namriah NamriahUniversitas Halu Oleo6
MUH TUFAILAAffiliation unknown5
Muhammad Alif K SahideAffiliation unknown5
Micah R. FisherAffiliation unknown5
Resman ResmanAffiliation unknown4
Elkawakib Syam'unAffiliation unknown4
Hasbullah SyafAffiliation unknown3
Jufri KarimUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Darwis DarwisUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Fachirah UlfaAffiliation unknown3
RafiuddinAffiliation unknown3
Feranita HaringAffiliation unknown3
Bart VerheijenAffiliation unknown3
Fatwa FaturachmatAffiliation unknown3
ZULFIKAR ZULFIKARUniversitas Halu Oleo2
M. Tufaila .Affiliation unknown2
Mursalim NohongAffiliation unknown2
Nurlina KasimAffiliation unknown2
Syatrianty A. SyaifulAffiliation unknown2
Muh RiadiAffiliation unknown2
Rafiuddin RafiuddinAffiliation unknown2
Fachira UlfaAffiliation unknown2
Vien Sartika DewiAffiliation unknown2
Heliawaty HeliawatyAffiliation unknown2
Eko RusdiantoAffiliation unknown2
Andi SadapottoAffiliation unknown2
Karno BatiranAffiliation unknown2
Dewi Nurhayati YusufUniversitas Halu Oleo1
NURMA ADEAffiliation unknown1
FIRA SYAWALLIA AZZAHRAAffiliation unknown1
MUHIDIN MUHIDINUniversitas Halu Oleo1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Injustice against Women in a Social Forestry Program: Case Studies from Two Indonesian Villages</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anugrah, Dadang </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Muin, Andi Vika Faradiba</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Irlan, Irlan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Tomasina, Muhammad Agung </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Azila, Nurul </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sirimorok, Nurhady </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Dungga, Novaty Eny </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Alam, Syamsu</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Discrimination</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Gender</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social forestry</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Inequality</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Social forestry programs, aimed to reduce poverty in forest communities while maintaining the forest function, are increasingly incorporating gender issues and responsiveness. By design, social forestry program is supposed to promote justice and equality for forest users, but on the ground discriminatory practices against women are occurring. Drawing case study from two Indonesian villages, this study examined the extent of discrimination against women in the implementation of the state social forestry programs. In-depth interviews, observations, and focused group discussions were conducted to collect the data from the villages to analyze the extent of discriminatory practices by using a social justice framework with a three-dimensional approach, namely recognition, representation, and participation, as well as distribution. This study found that women were not recognized as the primary users of forest land (not considered as farmers), low representation and participation of women in the Social Forestry Groups, and unequal distribution of benefits between women and men in obtaining assistance and participation in training for capacity building. Furthermore, gender based discrimination and inequality in social forestry are influenced by local social constructions in the form of patriarchal culture and religious belief. Finally, discrimination against women can take place even in state programs designed to bring justice in the context of joint forestry management, and the formal programs with a degree of gender responsive elements can be succumbed to biased local informal institutions and beliefs.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-11-03</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/20006</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24259/fs.v6i2.20006</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Forest and Society; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): NOVEMBER; 723-741</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4333</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4724</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/20006/8808</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Forest and Society</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>