Akses terbuka
Jurnal
Accountability, Sharia Compliance and Formal Zakat Intention Through Impact Efficacy and Trust
Hasanuddin Islamic Financial & Institutions · Vol. UME (2026) · hlm. 35–54
Terbit 2026-06-13
Penerbit Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University
Bahasa en
Abstrak
This study examines associations between perceived zakat accountability, perceived Sharia compliance, formal zakat payment intention, and two hypothesised intermediary appraisals: perceived impact efficacy and cognitive institutional trust. A cross-sectional questionnaire provided 326 eligible responses from adult zakat maal payers in South Sulawesi. Reflective measurement and specific indirect associations were assessed using PLS-SEM (SmartPLS 3). Cognitive trust had the largest direct association with formal intention (β = 0.391; f² = 0.180). Perceived accountability was indirectly associated with intention, although its direct path was not significant; perceived Sharia compliance showed direct and indirect associations. The specific serial paths were positive but small (β = 0.018 and 0.017). The model explained 29.3% of variation in stated intention. By distinguishing perceived programme effectiveness from procedural accountability, Sharia legitimacy and organisational trust, the study specifies an additional outcome-appraisal route within institutional zakat choice. The findings describe reported perceptions and intentions, not verified compliance, realised welfare effects or subsequent payments.
Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis
12 penulis ·
33 tautan kepenulisan bersama
Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.
Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/hifi/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en">Accountability, Sharia Compliance and Formal Zakat Intention Through Impact Efficacy and Trust</dc:title>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sulami, Muhammad Alfi Najmi Syarqiy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Furqan, Muhammad</dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sawedi, Andi Chaerullah</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Zakat governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Perceived Sharia compliance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Impact efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Institutional trust</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Formal zakat intention</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study examines associations between perceived zakat accountability, perceived Sharia compliance, formal zakat payment intention, and two hypothesised intermediary appraisals: perceived impact efficacy and cognitive institutional trust. A cross-sectional questionnaire provided 326 eligible responses from adult zakat maal payers in South Sulawesi. Reflective measurement and specific indirect associations were assessed using PLS-SEM (SmartPLS 3). Cognitive trust had the largest direct association with formal intention (β = 0.391; f² = 0.180). Perceived accountability was indirectly associated with intention, although its direct path was not significant; perceived Sharia compliance showed direct and indirect associations. The specific serial paths were positive but small (β = 0.018 and 0.017). The model explained 29.3% of variation in stated intention. By distinguishing perceived programme effectiveness from procedural accountability, Sharia legitimacy and organisational trust, the study specifies an additional outcome-appraisal route within institutional zakat choice. The findings describe reported perceptions and intentions, not verified compliance, realised welfare effects or subsequent payments.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2026-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/hifi/article/view/54599</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en">Hasanuddin Islamic Financial & Institutions; VOLUME 1 NUMBER 1, 2026; 35-54</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/hifi/article/view/54599/15134</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Alfi Najmi Syarqiy Sulami, Muhammad Furqan, Andi Chaerullah Sawedi</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Sitasi dan pengindeksan
OpenAlex
Belum diperiksa
Crossref
Tidak ditemukan
Jumlah menurut tiap indeks pada 9 Nov 2026; setiap indeks menghitung sitasi dengan cara berbeda.
Sitasi artikel ini
APA 7
Sulami, M. A. N. S., Furqan, M., & Sawedi, A. C. (2026). Accountability, Sharia Compliance and Formal Zakat Intention Through Impact Efficacy and Trust. Hasanuddin Islamic Financial & Institutions, UME, 35–54. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/hifi/article/view/54599
Salin
IEEE
M. A. N. S. Sulami, M. Furqan, and A. C. Sawedi, “Accountability, Sharia Compliance and Formal Zakat Intention Through Impact Efficacy and Trust,” Hasanuddin Islamic Financial & Institutions, vol. UME, pp. 35–54, 2026.
Salin
Dibuat dari metadata jurnal; periksa nama penulis sebelum dipakai.