Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Hedges and Booster in the Presidential Candidate Debate to Build the Candidate’s Image

Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature · Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024) · hlm. 76–90

DOI
10.15294/lc.v19i1.10079
ISSN
2460-853X, 1858-0157
Terbit
2024-10-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This research analyzed use of Hedges and Booster in the Presidential Candidate Debate to Build the Candidate’s Image in the YouTube Livestreaming video published on 4th February 2024. In conducting this study, the researchers employ descriptive qualitative method to describe the phenomenon of the Hedges and Booster used in the final presidential debate. Meanwhile, the theoretical framework is the theory of Brown and Levinson in 1987. The findings of the study reveal that there are 391 Hedges used and 842 Boosters used by the candidate in the final presidential debate. They use hedges to maintain their languages in the hope that the audience can follow their arguments clearly. Meanwhile, the use of booster in the languages is to boost their arguments and to reveal their objectivity in delivering the arguments.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

9 penulis · 21 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 10 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • State University of Semarang
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Galuh Kirana Dwi AreniState University of Semarang1
Nur LailiyahUniversitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri1
Favorita KurwidariaSebelas Maret University1
Monika Widyastuti SurtikantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Farida Indri WijayantiUIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/LC/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Hedges and Booster in the Presidential Candidate Debate to Build the Candidate’s Image</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Salsabilla, Fissilmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kurnia, Dea Tunjung</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Octaviani, Retno Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Cahyono, Setyo Prasiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pragmatics, Hedges, Booster, Debate, Indonesia Presidential Candidate</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">
This research analyzed use of Hedges and Booster in the Presidential Candidate Debate to Build the Candidate’s Image in the YouTube Livestreaming video published on 4th February 2024. In conducting this study, the researchers employ descriptive qualitative method to describe the phenomenon of the Hedges and Booster used in the final presidential debate. Meanwhile, the theoretical framework is the theory of Brown and Levinson in 1987. The findings of the study reveal that there are 391 Hedges used and 842 Boosters used by the candidate in the final presidential debate. They use hedges to maintain their languages in the hope that the audience can follow their arguments clearly. Meanwhile, the use of booster in the languages is to boost their arguments and to reveal their objectivity in delivering the arguments. 
</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-10-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/LC/article/view/10079</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lc.v19i1.10079</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): October 2024 Regular Issue; 76-90</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-853X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1858-0157</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/LC/article/view/10079/1832</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>