Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Legal Basis of Electronic Signatures in Civil Dispute Evidence in Indonesia: A Study of the Indonesian Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law): Dasar Hukum Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia: Kajian Terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Indonesia (UU ITE)

Annual Review of Legal Studies · Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) · hlm. 373–398

DOI
10.15294/arls.vol1i2.6498
ISSN
3047-7875, 3047-7581
Terbit
2024-06-09
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Documents signed electronically using electronic signatures are governed by the Indonesian Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), which regulates electronic information, electronic documents, and/or their printed results. According to the ITE Law, printed results, electronic documents, and/or electronic information are all considered valid additional evidence that can be used in court. These pieces of evidence constitute an extension and valid evidence according to the applicable procedural law in Indonesia and are also valid evidence in court. The research technique used to compile this article is literature research or normative juridical method, classified as legal research. Several court decisions have defined the legal authority of electronic signatures from the perspective of civil law. Thus, it is clear that from the perspective of civil law, electronic signatures have the same legal force as traditional signatures made with wet ink and have legal consequences. The considerations of judges in civil judgments consist of two parts: factual considerations, which are the evidence submitted by the parties, which party's evidence reaches the minimum threshold of proof, what arguments are proven, and to what extent the probative value held by the parties. The second part relates to legal considerations, including articles in statutory regulations and unwritten law as the basis for making judgments.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

28 penulis · 65 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yustina Dhian NovitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dewi Zahra SetyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Veyza OliviaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Armanda N ArdiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Qlarissa MelindaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hisyam Maliki AkbarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fitria DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rizqiya Lailatul IzzaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Indriana FirdausAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dian LatifianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suhadi SuhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang1
Wahyudin WahyudinSTKIP Taman Siswa Bima1
Kartika Fajar CahyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iwan SulistiyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yusuf Dwi UtomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisa TussalehaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
assayyidahfadlilahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pratama Herry HerlambangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Farkhan Radyafani WinarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad HabiburrahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Arif NugrahaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali MurtadhoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rayi Kharisma RajibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad RofiqAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/arls/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Legal Basis of Electronic Signatures in Civil Dispute Evidence in Indonesia: A Study of the Indonesian Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law): Dasar Hukum Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia: Kajian Terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Indonesia (UU ITE)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Arbaya, Nisma Raditya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Baidhowi, Baidhowi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Tanda Tangan Elektronik</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sengketa Perdata</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pembuktian</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Documents signed electronically using electronic signatures are governed by the Indonesian Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), which regulates electronic information, electronic documents, and/or their printed results. According to the ITE Law, printed results, electronic documents, and/or electronic information are all considered valid additional evidence that can be used in court. These pieces of evidence constitute an extension and valid evidence according to the applicable procedural law in Indonesia and are also valid evidence in court. The research technique used to compile this article is literature research or normative juridical method, classified as legal research. Several court decisions have defined the legal authority of electronic signatures from the perspective of civil law. Thus, it is clear that from the perspective of civil law, electronic signatures have the same legal force as traditional signatures made with wet ink and have legal consequences. The considerations of judges in civil judgments consist of two parts: factual considerations, which are the evidence submitted by the parties, which party's evidence reaches the minimum threshold of proof, what arguments are proven, and to what extent the probative value held by the parties. The second part relates to legal considerations, including articles in statutory regulations and unwritten law as the basis for making judgments.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-06-09</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/arls/article/view/6498</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/arls.vol1i2.6498</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Annual Review of Legal Studies; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024); 373-398</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3047-7875</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3047-7581</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/arls.vol1i2.%a</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/arls/article/view/6498/503</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>10.15294/arls.vol1i2.6498</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Nisma Raditya Arbaya, Baidhowi Baidhowi (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>