Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Neurocognitive Dysfunction and Criminal Liability: Integrating Neuroscience, Legal Theory, and Islamic Thought

Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 329–356

DOI
10.15294/ciils.v4i2.31833
ISSN
2829-8624, 2829-8373
Terbit
2025-12-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This article examines the relationship between neurocognitive dysfunction, criminal behaviour, legal theory, and Islamic thought, with particular attention to the neurobiological foundations of moral decision-making and criminal responsibility. Employing an interdisciplinary normative approach that integrates cognitive neuroscience, criminal law theory, moral philosophy, and Islamic jurisprudence, this study analyses how neurobiological dysfunctions especially those affecting the prefrontal cortex and amygdala may influence impulse control, moral judgement, and antisocial conduct. Drawing exclusively on a critical review of scholarly literature, judicial decisions, and normative legal sources, the article explores the implications of neuroscientific findings for concepts of free will, moral agency, and criminal liability. The analysis demonstrates that while neuroscientific evidence has the potential to inform sentencing mitigation and rehabilitative strategies, its application raises significant ethical and legal challenges, particularly concerning biological determinism, evidentiary reliability, and procedural fairness. From an Islamic legal perspective, sound intellect (‘aql) constitutes the foundation of taklīf (legal responsibility), yet Islamic jurisprudence recognises circumstances in which responsibility may be diminished or removed, in accordance with the principles of raf‘ al-ḥaraj and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The article argues that the absence of clear procedural standards and limited doctrinal integration of neuroscience within criminal justice systems particularly in Indonesia and Malaysia necessitates a more coherent normative framework. Ultimately, this study proposes a holistic and ethically grounded approach to criminal justice reform that integrates neuroscientific insights with legal principles and religious values, aiming to enhance proportionality, procedural justice, and human dignity.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

38 penulis · 105 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
  • Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo
  • University of Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Nurul MiqatAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
ZainuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SalleAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Nur Ikram FuadyAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hijrah LahalingUniversitas Ichsan Gorontalo2
Darmawati DarmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed ZabidiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad IkbalUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara2
Mustawa MustawaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Darmawati DarmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Samsu Alam MaddussilaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iwan Erar JoesoefAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul KholiqAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jeong Chun PhuocAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suherman SuhermanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adhiya FaisalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Safrin SalamUniversitas Muhammadiyah Buton1
Kunthi TridewiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kayode Muhammed IbrahimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Susi SusilawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sitti Fatimah MaddusilaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Baliana AmirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andi Intan PurnamasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurhayati MardinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adiguna KharismawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurhaedah NurhaedahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Marif MarifAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Intan PurnamasariUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Virgayani FattahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Susi SulilawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adfiyanti FadjarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ratu Ratna KorompolAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adiesty S.P. SyamsuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ciils/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Neurocognitive Dysfunction and Criminal Liability: Integrating Neuroscience, Legal Theory, and Islamic Thought</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nur, Rafika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hambali , Azwad Rachmat </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Igirisa, Ridwanto </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Zabidi, Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Neuroethics</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Criminal Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Neuroscience Evidence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Moral Responsibility</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Islamic Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article examines the relationship between neurocognitive dysfunction, criminal behaviour, legal theory, and Islamic thought, with particular attention to the neurobiological foundations of moral decision-making and criminal responsibility. Employing an interdisciplinary normative approach that integrates cognitive neuroscience, criminal law theory, moral philosophy, and Islamic jurisprudence, this study analyses how neurobiological dysfunctions especially those affecting the prefrontal cortex and amygdala may influence impulse control, moral judgement, and antisocial conduct. Drawing exclusively on a critical review of scholarly literature, judicial decisions, and normative legal sources, the article explores the implications of neuroscientific findings for concepts of free will, moral agency, and criminal liability. The analysis demonstrates that while neuroscientific evidence has the potential to inform sentencing mitigation and rehabilitative strategies, its application raises significant ethical and legal challenges, particularly concerning biological determinism, evidentiary reliability, and procedural fairness. From an Islamic legal perspective, sound intellect (‘aql) constitutes the foundation of taklīf (legal responsibility), yet Islamic jurisprudence recognises circumstances in which responsibility may be diminished or removed, in accordance with the principles of raf‘ al-ḥaraj and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The article argues that the absence of clear procedural standards and limited doctrinal integration of neuroscience within criminal justice systems particularly in Indonesia and Malaysia necessitates a more coherent normative framework. Ultimately, this study proposes a holistic and ethically grounded approach to criminal justice reform that integrates neuroscientific insights with legal principles and religious values, aiming to enhance proportionality, procedural justice, and human dignity.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ciils/article/view/31833</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ciils.v4i2.31833</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Digital Society and Interfaith Legal Challenges; 329-356</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-8624</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-8373</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ciils/article/view/31833/11778</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Rafika Nur, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, Azwad Rachmat  Hambali , Ridwanto  Igirisa, Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed  Zabidi (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>