Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

JUSTICE AND LEGAL RECOGNITION OF INTERFAITH HEIRS IN INDONESIA INHERITANCE LAW

Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 1–34

DOI
10.15294/ciils.v5i1.34347
ISSN
2829-8624, 2829-8373
Terbit
2026-06-25
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The pluralistic inheritance law system in Indonesia, which consists of Islamic inheritance law, Western civil inheritance law, and customary inheritance law, creates significant legal complexity, particularly in inheritance disputes involving differences of religion between the deceased and the heirs. Normatively, Islamic inheritance law does not recognize interfaith inheritance, while Western civil law adopts a principle of religious neutrality, and customary law varies according to each community’s kinship system. These differences result in unequal legal protection for interfaith heirs and raise serious issues regarding legal certainty and substantive justice. This research aims to analyze the legal position of interfaith heirs within Indonesia’s inheritance law system and to examine how the concept of justice is realized in judicial practice, particularly through the application of the concept of wasiat wajibah (mandatory bequest). This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and jurisprudential approaches. The findings demonstrate that Western civil inheritance law consistently recognizes inheritance rights without considering religious differences. In contrast, Islamic inheritance law normatively prohibits interfaith inheritance; however, judicial practice has developed the application of wasiat wajibah as a legal compromise to protect the economic interests of non-Muslim heirs of Muslim descendants. Nevertheless, the application of wasiat wajibah remains inconsistent and highly dependent on judicial discretion, resulting in legal uncertainty and unequal treatment in similar cases. This research concludes that the current pluralistic inheritance framework has not yet fully guaranteed legal certainty and substantive justice for interfaith heirs. Therefore, it recommends the harmonization and reformulation of national inheritance law to establish clearer and more uniform normative guidelines. Such reform is necessary to ensure the realization of legal certainty, social utility, and substantive justice while remaining aligned with religious values and the multicultural character of Indonesian society.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 135 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Aprila NiravitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rahayu Fery AnitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Baidhowi BaidhowiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dian LatifianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Indah Sri UtariAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Muhammad Adymas Hikal FikriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dewi Zahra SetyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Veyza OliviaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Armanda N ArdiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Qlarissa MelindaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hisyam Maliki AkbarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Diandra Preludio RamadaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ridwan ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Adiguna Bagas Waskito AjiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Puji WiyatnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Batari LaskarwatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bayangsari WedhatamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Benny SumardianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Syukron SalamAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Iqbal SyariefudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sang Ayu Putu RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Moh. Imam GusthomiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suhadi SuhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Asmarani RamliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Destina AnggiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dewi Nur HidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Azil MaskurAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wildan Azkal FikriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dede IndraswaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhamad Helmi Md SaidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rindia Fanny KusumaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rina AufaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini FidiyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ayup Suran NingsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kresna Adi PrasetyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ciils/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">JUSTICE AND LEGAL RECOGNITION OF INTERFAITH HEIRS IN INDONESIA INHERITANCE LAW</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Tri Andari Dahlan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ubaidillah Kamal</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yustina Dhian Novita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Firnanda, Risky Agung</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ulya, Aldina</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">inheritance law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">interfaith heirs</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">legal pluralism</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">islamic law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">civil law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">justice </dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">wasiat wajibah</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The pluralistic inheritance law system in Indonesia, which consists of Islamic inheritance law, Western civil inheritance law, and customary inheritance law, creates significant legal complexity, particularly in inheritance disputes involving differences of religion between the deceased and the heirs. Normatively, Islamic inheritance law does not recognize interfaith inheritance, while Western civil law adopts a principle of religious neutrality, and customary law varies according to each community’s kinship system. These differences result in unequal legal protection for interfaith heirs and raise serious issues regarding legal certainty and substantive justice. This research aims to analyze the legal position of interfaith heirs within Indonesia’s inheritance law system and to examine how the concept of justice is realized in judicial practice, particularly through the application of the concept of wasiat wajibah (mandatory bequest). This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and jurisprudential approaches. The findings demonstrate that Western civil inheritance law consistently recognizes inheritance rights without considering religious differences. In contrast, Islamic inheritance law normatively prohibits interfaith inheritance; however, judicial practice has developed the application of wasiat wajibah as a legal compromise to protect the economic interests of non-Muslim heirs of Muslim descendants. Nevertheless, the application of wasiat wajibah remains inconsistent and highly dependent on judicial discretion, resulting in legal uncertainty and unequal treatment in similar cases. This research concludes that the current pluralistic inheritance framework has not yet fully guaranteed legal certainty and substantive justice for interfaith heirs. Therefore, it recommends the harmonization and reformulation of national inheritance law to establish clearer and more uniform normative guidelines. Such reform is necessary to ensure the realization of legal certainty, social utility, and substantive justice while remaining aligned with religious values and the multicultural character of Indonesian society.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ciils/article/view/34347</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ciils.v5i1.34347</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Interfaith Dialogue and the Rule of Law; 1-34</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-8624</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-8373</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ciils/article/view/34347/10290</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Tri Andari Dahlan, Ubaidillah Kamal, Yustina Dhian Novita, Risky Agung Firnanda, Aldina Ulya (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>