Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Dynamics of Anti-Terrorism Regulation: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States: Dinamika Regulasi Anti-Terorisme: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Amerika Serikat

Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 185–226

DOI
10.15294/ijctns.v4i2.25125
ISSN
2829-890X, 2829-9027
Terbit
2025-12-29
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This paper examines the dynamics of anti-terrorism regulations in Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States by comparing the legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms in each country. legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms that apply in each country. The purpose of this research is to analyse how each country shapes its anti-terrorism law as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining a balance of as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining the balance between state security and human rights protection. The main issues discussed include differences in legal approach, scope of state authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent abuse of authority. abuse of authority. The method used is juridical method used is normative-comparative juridical by analysing statutory instruments, government policies, and institutional practices in the three countries. The results The results show that Indonesia emphasises procedural guarantees in its anti-terrorism law, Malaysia maintains a preventive detention model rooted in historical security doctrine. rooted in historical security doctrine, while the United States applies a layered a layered approach backed by extensive intelligence powers and judicial oversight. judicial oversight. In conclusion, although all three countries prioritise national security, their approaches reflect different security, their approaches reflect different legal traditions and political contexts. political context. Therefore, a balanced regulatory model should take into account effectiveness, constitutional accountability and protection of fundamental rights.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

27 penulis · 64 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 41 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Riau University
  • Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • State University of Gorontalo
  • Indonesia Open University
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Medan Area University
  • Tanjungpura University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ade Sathya Sanathana IshwaraUniversity of Mataram2
Mexsasai IndraRiau University2
Mukhlis RidwanRiau University1
Davit RahmadanRiau University1
Tajudin TajudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
H. Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MPAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fadhli Muhaimin IshaqUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Kevin M. RiveraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohamad Hidayat MuhtarState University of Gorontalo1
Askari RazakUniversitas Muslim Indonesia1
TarmudiUniversitas Ibnu Chaldun Jakarta1
Zean Via Aulia HakimUniversitas Sumatera Utara1
Fauzan GhafurPoliteknik Negeri Medan1
Indana ZulfahUniversitas Sumatera Utara1
WirawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M Jeffri Arlinandes ChandraIndonesia Open University1
A. Rahmat WirawanIndonesia Open University1
Umar MahdiUniversitas Jabal Ghafur1
Novendri Mohamad NggiluState University of Gorontalo1
Chami YassineAbu Dhabi University1
Ismandianto IsmandiantoRiau University1
Arini Azka MuthiaNational University of Malaysia1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/counterterrorism/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Dynamics of Anti-Terrorism Regulation: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States: Dinamika Regulasi Anti-Terorisme: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Amerika Serikat</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anang Hendri Prayogo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Saragih, Geofani Milthree</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Erdianto Effendi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Andi Hakim Lubis</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yuliana Yuliana </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Anti-Terrorism Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Comparative Legal Study</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">National Security</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Human Rights Protection</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This paper examines the dynamics of anti-terrorism regulations in Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States by comparing the legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms in each country. legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms that apply in each country. The purpose of this research is to analyse how each country shapes its anti-terrorism law as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining a balance of as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining the balance between state security and human rights protection. The main issues discussed include differences in legal approach, scope of state authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent abuse of authority. abuse of authority. The method used is juridical method used is normative-comparative juridical by analysing statutory instruments, government policies, and institutional practices in the three countries. The results The results show that Indonesia emphasises procedural guarantees in its anti-terrorism law, Malaysia maintains a preventive detention model rooted in historical security doctrine. rooted in historical security doctrine, while the United States applies a layered a layered approach backed by extensive intelligence powers and judicial oversight. judicial oversight. In conclusion, although all three countries prioritise national security, their approaches reflect different security, their approaches reflect different legal traditions and political contexts. political context. Therefore, a balanced regulatory model should take into account effectiveness, constitutional accountability and protection of fundamental rights.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/counterterrorism/article/view/25125</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijctns.v4i2.25125</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025; 185-226</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-890X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-9027</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijctns.v4i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/counterterrorism/article/view/25125/7740</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>