Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Legal–Security Paradox of Green Extractivism: A Green Criminology Inquiry into Corporate Roles and Counterterrorism Implications in Indonesia: Paradoks Hukum-Keamanan dalam Ekstraktivisme Hijau: Kajian Kriminologi Hijau mengenai Peran Korporasi dan Implikasinya terhadap Pemberantasan Terorisme di Indonesia

Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 109–152

DOI
10.15294/ijctns.v5i1.48210
ISSN
2829-890X, 2829-9027
Terbit
2026-06-29
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This article critically examines the structural incapacity of Indonesian law to anticipate and regulate the transformation of natural resource exploitation into vectors of national security risk. Operating within the normative-doctrinal tradition, the study adopts statute, conceptual, and case-based legal approaches to interrogate the triadic relationship between corporate actors, ecological destruction, and political violence. The central argument advanced is that Indonesian law sustains a paradox: it simultaneously authorises resource extraction as a developmental imperative while failing to acknowledge that extractivism generates structural grievances which may radicalise affected communities, thereby constituting a pre-terrorism environment. Green criminology serves as the analytical framework, augmented by ecological justice theory, Rawlsian distributive philosophy, and Critical Legal Studies. Doctrinal analysis reveals that the Mineral and Coal Mining Law (UU Minerba), the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UUPPLH), and the Anti-Terrorism Law (UU Terorisme) operate in regulatory silos, producing normative gaps through which corporations escape accountability for harms that transcend environmental categories and enter the domain of human-ecological security threats. Case analysis of PT. Kallista Alam, PT. Adei Plantation, and related litigation demonstrates that courts have yet to articulate a jurisprudential framework linking corporate environmental crime to security consequences. This article concludes by proposing a 'Green Security Law Framework' an integrated normative architecture reconciling environmental, security, and counterterrorism law as the prescriptive response to a legal deficit that renders the Indonesian state structurally complicit in its own security vulnerabilities.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

38 penulis · 100 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 29 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Jenderal Soedirman University
  • The University of Melbourne
  • Sriwijaya University
  • National University of Malaysia
  • Sakarya University
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muhammad Azil MaskurState University of Semarang4
Wildan Azkal FikriSriwijaya University3
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang2
Dheni Anugerah PrasetyaState University of Semarang2
Baginda Khalid Hidayat JatiJenderal Soedirman University2
Yustina Dhian NovitaState University of Semarang1
Muhamad Helmi Md SaidNational University of Malaysia1
Nurul FibriantiState University of Semarang1
Ridwan ArifinState University of Semarang1
R. Benny RiyantoState University of Semarang1
Karsinah KarsinahState University of Semarang1
Bintang Rafli AnantaState University of Semarang1
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahState University of Semarang1
Galih Niken Anggoto SulaksmiState University of Semarang1
Aisyah Nur RafidahSakarya University1
Ali Masyhar MursyidState University of Semarang1
Safira Embun InsanidyaState University of Semarang1
Kayla Achri SalsabilaState University of Semarang1
Nafa Isma Nur FattihState University of Semarang1
Umi Khaerah PatiSebelas Maret University1
Nurani Ajeng Tri UtamiJenderal Soedirman University1
Setya WahyudiJenderal Soedirman University1
Tedi SudrajatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Chander Mohan GuptaShoolini University1
Yayuk WhindariUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Maya RuhtianiJenderal Soedirman University1
Sulistyandari SulistyandariJenderal Soedirman University1
Hyun‐Kyung ParkYoungsan University1
Kartono KartowijonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aryuni YuliantiningsihJenderal Soedirman University1
Hibnu NugrohoJenderal Soedirman University1
S. Pratiwi AminuddinJenderal Soedirman University1
Agus RaharjoJenderal Soedirman University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/counterterrorism/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Legal–Security Paradox of Green Extractivism: A Green Criminology Inquiry into Corporate Roles and Counterterrorism Implications in Indonesia: Paradoks Hukum-Keamanan dalam Ekstraktivisme Hijau: Kajian Kriminologi Hijau mengenai Peran Korporasi dan Implikasinya terhadap Pemberantasan Terorisme di Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Huwae, Venessa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Tedi , Sudrajat</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Tri Lisiani Prihatinah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Pandya, Duhita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Dede Indraswara</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Green Extractivism</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Green Criminology</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Counterterrorism Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Corporate Environmental Liability</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ecological Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article critically examines the structural incapacity of Indonesian law to anticipate and regulate the transformation of natural resource exploitation into vectors of national security risk. Operating within the normative-doctrinal tradition, the study adopts statute, conceptual, and case-based legal approaches to interrogate the triadic relationship between corporate actors, ecological destruction, and political violence. The central argument advanced is that Indonesian law sustains a paradox: it simultaneously authorises resource extraction as a developmental imperative while failing to acknowledge that extractivism generates structural grievances which may radicalise affected communities, thereby constituting a pre-terrorism environment. Green criminology serves as the analytical framework, augmented by ecological justice theory, Rawlsian distributive philosophy, and Critical Legal Studies. Doctrinal analysis reveals that the Mineral and Coal Mining Law (UU Minerba), the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UUPPLH), and the Anti-Terrorism Law (UU Terorisme) operate in regulatory silos, producing normative gaps through which corporations escape accountability for harms that transcend environmental categories and enter the domain of human-ecological security threats. Case analysis of PT. Kallista Alam, PT. Adei Plantation, and related litigation demonstrates that courts have yet to articulate a jurisprudential framework linking corporate environmental crime to security consequences. This article concludes by proposing a 'Green Security Law Framework' an integrated normative architecture reconciling environmental, security, and counterterrorism law as the prescriptive response to a legal deficit that renders the Indonesian state structurally complicit in its own security vulnerabilities.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/counterterrorism/article/view/48210</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijctns.v5i1.48210</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June, 2026; 109-152</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-890X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-9027</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijctns.v5i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/counterterrorism/article/view/48210/10690</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Venessa Huwae, Sudrajat Tedi , Tri Lisiani Prihatinah, Duhita Pandya, Dede Indraswara (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>