Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Redesign of The Presidential Threshold System Following The Constitutional Court Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024

The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 107–132

DOI
10.15294/digest.v6i1.29019
ISSN
2746-0371, 2746-2110
Terbit
2025-07-02
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Since the 2004 elections, Indonesia has implemented a presidential threshold system for nominating the president and vice president. This system requires a political party or coalition to receive a certain percentage of nationally valid votes or acquire a certain number of seats in the DPR in order to nominate a presidential candidate. However, this system's implementation is considered one of the causes of the strengthening of oligarchic practices among political party elites, as well as a deviation from the democratic values of the Indonesian state philosophy, or Pancasila. In January 2025, however, the Constitutional Court canceled the presidential threshold policy for the nomination of the president and vice president through Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024. This research discusses the redesign of the presidential threshold following this decision. The study employs a qualitative approach and draws on Pippa Norris's theory of political recruitment and Wriggs's concept of legal prismatics. This study concludes that the presidential threshold system requires conceptual reform so that it is guided not only by the quantity of valid votes or seats acquired by political parties, but also by considerations of the quality of democracy in presidential and vice presidential elections based on the principles of the Indonesian state philosophy, or pancasila. Thus, the presidential threshold system must be reformed using the concept of legal prismatics.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

4 penulis · 4 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
ArifudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
WinarsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/digest/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Redesign of The Presidential Threshold System Following The Constitutional Court Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Arifudin, Arifudin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Susi Dian Rahayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Presidential Threshold</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal Prismatics</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Democration</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Election</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Since the 2004 elections, Indonesia has implemented a presidential threshold system for nominating the president and vice president. This system requires a political party or coalition to receive a certain percentage of nationally valid votes or acquire a certain number of seats in the DPR in order to nominate a presidential candidate. However, this system's implementation is considered one of the causes of the strengthening of oligarchic practices among political party elites, as well as a deviation from the democratic values of the Indonesian state philosophy, or Pancasila. In January 2025, however, the Constitutional Court canceled the presidential threshold policy for the nomination of the president and vice president through Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024. This research discusses the redesign of the presidential threshold following this decision. The study employs a qualitative approach and draws on Pippa Norris's theory of political recruitment and Wriggs's concept of legal prismatics. This study concludes that the presidential threshold system requires conceptual reform so that it is guided not only by the quantity of valid votes or seats acquired by political parties, but also by considerations of the quality of democracy in presidential and vice presidential elections based on the principles of the Indonesian state philosophy, or pancasila. Thus, the presidential threshold system must be reformed using the concept of legal prismatics.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-07-02</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">300</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/digest/article/view/29019</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/digest.v6i1.29019</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): The Digest, June 2025 ; 107-132</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2746-0371</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2746-2110</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/digest.v6i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/digest/article/view/29019/4734</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>