Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

MECC scheduling algorithm in vehicular environment for uplink transmission in LTE networks

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v9i2.pp1191-1200
ISSN
2088-8708, 2088-8708
Published
2019-04-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) is chosen because of the lower peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) value in uplink transmission. However, the contiguity constraint is one of the major constraint presents in uplink packet scheduling, where all RBs allocated to a single UE must be contiguous in the frequency-domain within each time slot to maintain its single carrier. This paper proposed an uplink-scheduling algorithm namely the Maximum Expansion with Contiguity Constraints (MECC) algorithm, which supports both the RT and NRT services. The MECC algorithm is deployed in two stages. In the first stage, the RBs are allocated fairly among the UEs. The second stage allocates the RBs with the highest metric value and expands the allocation on both sides of the matrix, M with respect to the contiguity constraint. The performance of the MECC algorithm was observed in terms of throughput, fairness, delay, and Packet Loss Ratio (PLR) for VoIP, video and best effort flows. The MECC scheduling algorithm is compared to other algorithms namely the Round Robin (RR), Channel-Dependent First Maximum Expansion (CD-FME), and Proportional Fairness First Maximum Expansion (PF-FME). From here, it can be concluded that the MECC algorithm shows the best results among other algorithms by delivering the highest throughput which is up to 81.29% and 90.04% than CD-FME and RR scheduler for RT and NRT traffic respectively, having low PLR and delay which is up to 93.92% and 56.22% of improvement than CD-FME for the RT traffic flow. The MECC also has a satisfactory level of fairness for the cell-edge users in a vehicular environment of LTE network.

Collaboration network of the authors

21 authors · 47 co-authorship links · 11 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Sultan Zainal Abidin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Norsuzila Ya’acobUniversiti Teknologi MARA5
Noraisyah TajudinUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Nor Aizam AdnanUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Aliya Syahira Mohd AnuarUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Wan Norsyafizan W. MuhamadUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Shajahan MaidinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Mohd Kamarulnizam Abdul RahimAffiliation unknown2
Yusmardiah YusufUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Mohd Danial RozainiUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Azlina IdrisUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Ezmin AbdullahUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Ainnur Eiza AzharUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Nik Nur Shaadah Nik DzulkefliUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Mohd Azri Abdul AzizUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Roslan UmarSultan Zainal Abidin University1
Wan Haszerila Wan HassanUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Murizah Binti KassimUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Juwita Mohd SultanUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>MECC scheduling algorithm in vehicular environment for uplink transmission in LTE networks</dc:title><dc:creator>Ismail, Shafinaz</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ali, Darmawaty Mohd</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yusof, Azita Laily</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) is chosen because of the lower peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) value in uplink transmission. However, the contiguity constraint is one of the major constraint presents in uplink packet scheduling, where all RBs allocated to a single UE must be contiguous in the frequency-domain within each time slot to maintain its single carrier. This paper proposed an uplink-scheduling algorithm namely the Maximum Expansion with Contiguity Constraints (MECC) algorithm, which supports both the RT and NRT services. The MECC algorithm is deployed in two stages. In the first stage, the RBs are allocated fairly among the UEs. The second stage allocates the RBs with the highest metric value and expands the allocation on both sides of the matrix, M with respect to the contiguity constraint. The performance of the MECC algorithm was observed in terms of throughput, fairness, delay, and Packet Loss Ratio (PLR) for VoIP, video and best effort flows. The MECC scheduling algorithm is compared to other algorithms namely the Round Robin (RR), Channel-Dependent First Maximum Expansion (CD-FME), and Proportional Fairness First Maximum Expansion (PF-FME). From here, it can be concluded that the MECC algorithm shows the best results among other algorithms by delivering the highest throughput which is up to 81.29% and 90.04% than CD-FME and RR scheduler for RT and NRT traffic respectively, having low PLR and delay which is up to 93.92% and 56.22% of improvement than CD-FME for the RT traffic flow. The MECC also has a satisfactory level of fairness for the cell-edge users in a vehicular environment of LTE network.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2019-04-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i2.pp1191-1200</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v9i2.pp1191-1200</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 9 No 2 (2019); 1191</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/13417/11628</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>