Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Students’ Perceptions of Reflective Practices (RP) Implementation to Learn Critical Thinking (CT) in Class Discussions (CD)

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019) · hlm. 144–156

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i1.27748
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2019-01-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The present study delivers the twelfth grade students’ experiences who implement reflective practice as a technique to learn critical thinking skills when joining the class discussion. However, their perceptions on the above activity have to be a fundamental issue for the success of learning. This descriptive qualitative case study took place at SMA N 2 Masbagik of East Lombok. It aimed to describe and explain students’ reflective practice implementation, their critical thinking manifestations, and their perceptions of the reflective practice implementation to learn critical thinking skills in class discussions. Taken from field notes observation and video recordings revealed three stages of reflection process considered by the students when implementing the reflective practice. It consisted of stating positive behaviour, ideas, and feelings (first stage), returning to experience, attending to feelings, and reevaluating experiences/events/phenomena (second stage), and making conclusion or commitment (third stage). They also showed three ways in expressing critical thinking as proposed by Halpern (2003). It consists of verbal reasoning, arguments, and making decision. Furthermore, the data from open-ended questionnaire and interview revealed the domination of positive perceptions. Through this study, the writer opens the idea to give suggestion that this activity should based on clear instructions and theoretical background to meet the teaching and learning goal.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 110 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 5 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Ministry of Education and Culture
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi RukminiState University of Semarang15
Januarius MujiyantoState University of Semarang11
Djoko SutopoState University of Semarang10
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoState University of Semarang8
Abdurrachman FaridiState University of Semarang8
Mursid SalehState University of Semarang7
Suwandi SuwandiState University of Semarang6
Rudi HartonoState University of Semarang5
Issy YuliasriState University of Semarang4
Rahayu Puji HaryantiState University of Semarang3
Warsono WarsonoState University of Semarang3
Fahrur RoziState University of Semarang3
Puji AstutiState University of Semarang2
Zulfa SakhiyyaState University of Semarang2
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang2
Abdurrahman FaridiState University of Semarang2
Saeful BahriNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Siti NurohmahState University of Semarang1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniState University of Semarang1
Hanum BestariState University of Semarang1
Nurlaila TuananyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Manikowati ManikowatiMinistry of Education and Culture1
Kiki Nuriska DenhasState University of Semarang1
Yulianti YuliantiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Windhariyati Dyah KusumawantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
abdulhakim faraj alowalidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Toto NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Inayatul MaulaState University of Semarang1
Yulia Shinta KusumaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tutik LestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rifqi Hazmi MamduhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yayang Gita Permatasari GunawanState University of Semarang1
Andi Tenry Lawangen Aspat ColleState University of Semarang1
Aris NoviState University of Semarang1
Sisilia Agustin Dini IslamiState University of Semarang1
Dwi Amalia PutriState University of Semarang1
Oscar Yustino CarascalaoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Students’ Perceptions of Reflective Practices (RP) Implementation to Learn Critical Thinking (CT) in Class Discussions (CD)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Fatwassani, Rezza</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Bharati, Dwi Anggani Linggar</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The present study delivers the twelfth grade students’ experiences who implement reflective practice as a technique to learn critical thinking skills when joining the class discussion. However, their perceptions on the above activity have to be a fundamental issue for the success of learning. This descriptive qualitative case study took place at SMA N 2 Masbagik of East Lombok. It aimed to describe and explain students’ reflective practice implementation, their critical thinking manifestations, and their perceptions of the reflective practice implementation to learn critical thinking skills in class discussions. Taken from field notes observation and video recordings revealed three stages of reflection process considered by the students when implementing the reflective practice. It consisted of stating positive behaviour, ideas, and feelings (first stage), returning to experience, attending to feelings, and reevaluating experiences/events/phenomena (second stage), and making conclusion or commitment (third stage). They also showed three ways in expressing critical thinking as proposed by Halpern (2003). It consists of verbal reasoning, arguments, and making decision. Furthermore, the data from open-ended questionnaire and interview revealed the domination of positive perceptions. Through this study, the writer opens the idea to give suggestion that this activity should based on clear instructions and theoretical background to meet the teaching and learning goal.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-01-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/27748</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i1.27748</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 2 (2019): June 2019; 144-156</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/27748/12359</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>