Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Realization of Conversational Implicatures in Listening Comprehension of ‘Longman Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test’

English Education Journal · Vol. 12 No. 4 (2022) · hlm. 498–509

DOI
10.15294/eej.v12i4.58992
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2022-12-23
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Studying implicatures cannot be separated from studying pragmatics. Studying pragmatics is studying meaning in context. Understanding meaning in context is very essential in communication. The purpose of the study was to explain the realization of idiosyncratic and formulaic conversational implicatures in listening comprehension section of ‘LONGMAN Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test’. Qualitative research is used to collect data, analyze the data, and take a conclusion based on the analysis of the findings. The type of qualitative study used is content analysis. In a TOEFL book titled LONGMAN Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test, data were implicatures in every conversation covered in the script of the short conversation of listening comprehension section. The researcher found that the four types of idiosyncratic implicature were all in the short conversations of listening comprehension section in the TOEFL book "LONGMAN Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test.” Meanwhile, formulaic implicature that could be found were idiomatic, scalar, sequential, and indirect criticism implicature. However, the other formulaic implicature such as pope-Q and MRR (Minimum Requirement Rule) could not be found. Finally, it is expected that the result of this research can provide scientific information about formulaic and idiosyncratic conversational implicature theory and practically improve students' awareness of formulaic and idiosyncratic implicature. It is also expected that it can help the students to do the listening comprehension section in every TOEFL test. Then, the results of this research can pedagogically be used to understand English better in its actual use and help learners better understand formulaic and idiosyncratic implicature.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 79 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Tidar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Issy YuliasriState University of Semarang4
Rudi HartonoState University of Semarang2
Dwi RukminiState University of Semarang2
Zulfa SakhiyyaState University of Semarang2
Widya AmaliaState University of Semarang2
Fahrur RoziState University of Semarang1
Faiz MaulidaState University of Semarang1
Egi RaputriState University of Semarang1
Yan MujiyantoState University of Semarang1
Etri WijayantiState University of Semarang1
Luluatul Musyafa’ahState University of Semarang1
Tomy WidiyantoState University of Semarang1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiState University of Semarang1
Ayu Dewi FatimahState University of Semarang1
Heru PriyatnaState University of Semarang1
Umniyyatul MakmurohState University of Semarang1
Abdurrachman FaridiState University of Semarang1
Muhammad Zaiim MuhtadiState University of Semarang1
Mursid SalehState University of Semarang1
Ummi Ashim AzzahraState University of Semarang1
Puji AstutiState University of Semarang1
Ema Sri RahayuState University of Semarang1
Shofi Anis FitrianaState University of Semarang1
Henrikus Joko YuliantoState University of Semarang1
Lina ShofiahState University of Semarang1
Syahid AbdullohState University of Semarang1
Annisa Nurul ShabrinaState University of Semarang1
Katharina RustipaState University of Semarang1
Gabby Allen Vica IsfaraState University of Semarang1
Eka Yulianti FajlinState University of Semarang1
Qurrot AinyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mar' Atul Latifah Jauharin Nafi'State University of Semarang1
Alisha Rahma PutriState University of Semarang1
Imas IstianiState University of Semarang1
Nyoman Karina WedhantiState University of Semarang1
Sukarno SukarnoUniversitas Tidar1
Pryla RochmahwatiState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Realization of Conversational Implicatures in Listening Comprehension of ‘Longman Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test’</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Khotimah, Etik Khusnul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Djanuarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pratama, Hendi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Studying implicatures cannot be separated from studying pragmatics. Studying pragmatics is studying meaning in context. Understanding meaning in context is very essential in communication. The purpose of the study was to explain the realization of idiosyncratic and formulaic conversational implicatures in listening comprehension section of ‘LONGMAN Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test’. Qualitative research is used to collect data, analyze the data, and take a conclusion based on the analysis of the findings. The type of qualitative study used is content analysis. In a TOEFL book titled LONGMAN Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test, data were implicatures in every conversation covered in the script of the short conversation of listening comprehension section. The researcher found that the four types of idiosyncratic implicature were all in the short conversations of listening comprehension section in the TOEFL book "LONGMAN Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test.” Meanwhile, formulaic implicature that could be found were idiomatic, scalar, sequential, and indirect criticism implicature. However, the other formulaic implicature such as pope-Q and MRR (Minimum Requirement Rule) could not be found. Finally, it is expected that the result of this research can provide scientific information about formulaic and idiosyncratic conversational implicature theory and practically improve students' awareness of formulaic and idiosyncratic implicature. It is also expected that it can help the students to do the listening comprehension section in every TOEFL test. Then, the results of this research can pedagogically be used to understand English better in its actual use and help learners better understand formulaic and idiosyncratic implicature.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-12-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/58992</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v12i4.58992</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 12 No 4 (2022): December 2022; 498-509</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v12i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/58992/23998</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>