Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Evaluating The Quality of Teacher’s Talk in English Classroom Interaction at SMPIT Cahaya Bangsa Semarang

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 3 (2023) · hlm. 380–390

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i3.73190
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2023-09-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Teachers talk play an essential role in classroom interaction, the study evaluated the quality of the teacher’s talk in English language class using Flanders (FIAC) system (1989) in Teacher‟s talk interaction. It aimed to evaluate seven of teacher talk quality in English classroom interaction. The study used a descriptive qualitative research design since involves human behavior in natural setting. The data was collected used audio recording and observed two class meetings at eighth grade of SMPIT Cahaya Bangsa Semarang which took approximately 160 minutes. One of English teacher was the subject and 29 students was the object in this study. The result of the study showed that asked questions was the most frequently shown which is 63 times, with percentage 36,2%. Giving direction was the often shown which is 47 times, with percentage 27,01%. Praises and encourages was the quite often shown which is 29 times, with percentage 16,66%. Lecturing was the quite rare shown which is 14 times, with percentage 8,04%. Accept feeling was the rarely shown which is 8 times, with percentage 4,6%. Criticizing or justifying authority was the rarely shown which is 7 times, with percentage 4,02%. Accepts and uses idea of students was the rarest shown which is 6 times, with percentage 3,44%. The evaluated of teacher‟s talk interaction quality that teacher focus on two interactions are asked questions and giving direction.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 104 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rini FidiyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Eko MukmintoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Irawaty IrawatyAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
bintang priyanto putriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Holy Latifah HanumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Fery AnitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Edward Michael SimangunsongAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hafidz DaffaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Samuel Adi NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aldha WilliyanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jati Widya IswaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endang Siti NurkholidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gisty ListianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Meli FauziahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
May LorennaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyu Dyah Nur Anis WachidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fajar Nugroho Dwi AtmojoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Fanti SulistiyaningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus DwiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eva YulitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ruli RuliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lia IndriyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Shofyatul FuadiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Akhmad ZamroniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Rizki GiffaryAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anisah PuspitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Azhar Maulana Maghribi SidiqAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kiki MeiaristaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Evaluating The Quality of Teacher’s Talk in English Classroom Interaction at SMPIT Cahaya Bangsa Semarang</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Prastowo, Alfat</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wuli Fritrianti, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widhiyanto, Widhiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Teachers talk play an essential role in classroom interaction, the study evaluated the quality of the teacher’s talk in English language class using Flanders (FIAC) system (1989) in Teacher‟s talk interaction. It aimed to evaluate seven of teacher talk quality in English classroom interaction. The study used a descriptive qualitative research design since involves human behavior in natural setting. The data was collected used audio recording and observed two class meetings at eighth grade of SMPIT Cahaya Bangsa Semarang which took approximately 160 minutes. One of English teacher was the subject and 29 students was the object in this study. The result of the study showed that asked questions was the most frequently shown which is 63 times, with percentage 36,2%. Giving direction was the often shown which is 47 times, with percentage 27,01%. Praises and encourages was the quite often shown which is 29 times, with percentage 16,66%. Lecturing was the quite rare shown which is 14 times, with percentage 8,04%. Accept feeling was the rarely shown which is 8 times, with percentage 4,6%. Criticizing or justifying authority was the rarely shown which is 7 times, with percentage 4,02%. Accepts and uses idea of students was the rarest shown which is 6 times, with percentage 3,44%. The evaluated of teacher‟s talk interaction quality that teacher focus on two interactions are asked questions and giving direction.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/73190</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i3.73190</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 3 (2023): September 2023; 380-390</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/73190/26010</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>