Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Cohesion and coherence in the final project abstracts written by undergraduate students

ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020) · hlm. 131–139

DOI
10.15294/elt.v9i2.37785
ISSN
2721-4532, 2252-6706
Terbit
2020-11-30
Penerbit
English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Writing an abstract was not different from writing other kinds of text. As a part of the final project, an abstract should be written clearly, cohesively and coherently. This study aimed to examine cohesion and coherence of the students’ final project abstracts. It also focused to reveal the factors which influenced the quality of the students’ final project abstracts. This study concerned with text analysis. The investigation approach of this study used written discourse analysis. The data of this study were thirty abstracts which were taken from final project abstracts of English Department undergraduate students of Universitas Negeri Semarang in the academic year of 2017-2018. The findings showed that the students did not utilize the five types of cohesive devices to build cohesion in their abstracts. However, it was sufficient to utilize at least three types of cohesive devices to make the abstracts cohesive. Based on Theme and Rheme theory by Halliday, the abstracts were written coherently because they applied the use of cohesive devices. This research also found that there were two factors which influenced the quality of the abstracts. They were the usage of cohesive devices to build cohesion in the abstracts and the usage of Theme and Rheme and thematic progression to build coherence in the abstracts. In conclusion, it was clear that the usage of cohesive devices and Theme and Rheme helped the students write the abstracts cohesively and coherently.The abstract should be written in one paragraph of 150-250 words. Calisto MT font size 9 single spacing. It should containgeneral statement about the primacy of the topic under investigation, research gap, the objectives, method, main findings, and the conclusions.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

21 penulis · 33 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pasca KalisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annafs AzzakiyyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ricky Fajar AdiputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Vionita Iken RestianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Venna Asyifa RamadhantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Melisa DestrianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jazah SyukrillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmed Falih El AfifAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nasywa Ayu MalihahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rudi Wibowo AjiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Akhmad MaemunAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anggie FebriyanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik KholisohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuliati YuliatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Cohesion and coherence in the final project abstracts written by undergraduate students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Arifin, Ilham Setiawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Farida, Alief Noor</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Writing an abstract was not different from writing other kinds of text. As a part of the final project, an abstract should be written clearly, cohesively and coherently. This study aimed to examine cohesion and coherence of the students’ final project abstracts. It also focused to reveal the factors which influenced the quality of the students’ final project abstracts. This study concerned with text analysis. The investigation approach of this study used written discourse analysis. The data of this study were thirty abstracts which were taken from final project abstracts of English Department undergraduate students of Universitas Negeri Semarang in the academic year of 2017-2018. The findings showed that the students did not utilize the five types of cohesive devices to build cohesion in their abstracts. However, it was sufficient to utilize at least three types of cohesive devices to make the abstracts cohesive. Based on Theme and Rheme theory by Halliday, the abstracts were written coherently because they applied the use of cohesive devices. This research also found that there were two factors which influenced the quality of the abstracts. They were the usage of cohesive devices to build cohesion in the abstracts and the usage of Theme and Rheme and thematic progression to build coherence in the abstracts. In conclusion, it was clear that the usage of cohesive devices and Theme and Rheme helped the students write the abstracts cohesively and coherently.The abstract should be written in one paragraph of 150-250 words. Calisto MT font size 9 single spacing. It should containgeneral statement about the primacy of the topic under investigation, research gap, the objectives, method, main findings, and the conclusions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/37785</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/elt.v9i2.37785</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; Vol 9 No 2 (2020): ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; 131-139</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-4532</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6706</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/elt.v9i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/37785/17453</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Ilham Setiawan Arifin</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>