Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Hypocrisy of Liberation: Power, NGOization, and Crisis in West Kalimantan Legal Aid

The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education · Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026) · hlm. 721–758

DOI
10.15294/ijicle.v7i4.38083
ISSN
2721-8368
Terbit
2026-02-28
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The structural legal aid movement was initiated by the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI) as an ideological project aimed at cultivating political and legal consciousness among marginalized groups, marking a departure from conventional legal aid models grounded in legal neutrality. Despite its emancipatory narrative, the movement has become increasingly entangled in processes of NGOization, generating institutional ambivalence and dysfunction between parent and local organizations. This article examines the crisis of the structural legal aid movement in West Kalimantan by analyzing the hierarchical relationship between LBH Kalbar and YLBHI. It addresses how emancipatory ideals within the legal aid movement are undermined by NGOization, managerialism, and a fragmented civic space, and explores how power operates within the movement’s internal governance. Employing an empirical legal approach informed by socio-legal ethnography and participant observation, the study investigates organizational dynamics, work culture, and advocacy practices within LBH Kalbar. Primary data were collected through participant observation as an external supporter involved in project-based initiatives and advocacy programmes, while secondary data were drawn from internal documents accessed with institutional permission. The findings demonstrate that the decline of LBH Kalbar cannot be attributed to technical deficiencies or individual incapacity, but rather reflects a deeper ideological conflict between emancipatory praxis and a technocratic governance regime imposed by the parent organization. NGOization has redirected advocacy from community organizing toward performance-driven project work, producing depoliticization, weakened solidarity, activist burnout, and discriminatory governance practices. Power operates through disciplinary mechanisms such as standardization, performance metrics, symbolic surveillance, and organizational restructuring. The study concludes that revitalizing the legal aid movement requires not merely administrative reform, but a reconfiguration of power relations through enhanced regional autonomy and dialogical, participatory governance.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 90 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 15 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
  • Institut Agama Islam Nurul Hakim
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Oheo Kaimuddin HarisUniversitas Halu Oleo7
Handrawan HandrawanUniversitas Halu Oleo5
Syahbudin SyahbudinUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Anton YudhanaUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan1
Fitri AnggrainiUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan1
Nurhafidah NurhafidahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Andrean Gregorius Pandapotan SimamoraUniversitas Airlangga1
Wahyu AliansaUniversitas Airlangga1
Nadilla Mayang ChahyaniUniversitas Airlangga1
La Ode SyukurUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Jopang JopangUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muh AmirUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Iskandar IskandarUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muhar JayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alfiyan AlfiyanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yusuf MarsAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Deity YuningsihUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Teguh PratiknyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad ArifUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Rusnadi Dwi SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Didik EfriantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sabrina HidayatUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muhammad SidratAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Supriyadin SupriyadinUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kendari1
Darwin PandjaitanInstitut Agama Islam Nurul Hakim1
Adi Rais PatanraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Safril Sofwan SanibUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Rahman HasimaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Heryanti HeryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali RizkyUniversitas Halu Oleo1
La Ode Muhamad SulihinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muhammad Jufri DewaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Guasman TatawuUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Hamdan FikriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Arifin IlhamInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Finsa Adhi PratamaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Muḥammad IqbālInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Kartini KartiniInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/iccle/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Hypocrisy of Liberation: Power, NGOization, and Crisis in West Kalimantan Legal Aid</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Moh. Fadhil</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Herman, Herman</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Structural Legal Aid</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">NGOization</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Power relations</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Institutional governance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">West Kalimantan</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The structural legal aid movement was initiated by the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI) as an ideological project aimed at cultivating political and legal consciousness among marginalized groups, marking a departure from conventional legal aid models grounded in legal neutrality. Despite its emancipatory narrative, the movement has become increasingly entangled in processes of NGOization, generating institutional ambivalence and dysfunction between parent and local organizations. This article examines the crisis of the structural legal aid movement in West Kalimantan by analyzing the hierarchical relationship between LBH Kalbar and YLBHI. It addresses how emancipatory ideals within the legal aid movement are undermined by NGOization, managerialism, and a fragmented civic space, and explores how power operates within the movement’s internal governance. Employing an empirical legal approach informed by socio-legal ethnography and participant observation, the study investigates organizational dynamics, work culture, and advocacy practices within LBH Kalbar. Primary data were collected through participant observation as an external supporter involved in project-based initiatives and advocacy programmes, while secondary data were drawn from internal documents accessed with institutional permission. The findings demonstrate that the decline of LBH Kalbar cannot be attributed to technical deficiencies or individual incapacity, but rather reflects a deeper ideological conflict between emancipatory praxis and a technocratic governance regime imposed by the parent organization. NGOization has redirected advocacy from community organizing toward performance-driven project work, producing depoliticization, weakened solidarity, activist burnout, and discriminatory governance practices. Power operates through disciplinary mechanisms such as standardization, performance metrics, symbolic surveillance, and organizational restructuring. The study concludes that revitalizing the legal aid movement requires not merely administrative reform, but a reconfiguration of power relations through enhanced regional autonomy and dialogical, participatory governance.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-02-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/iccle/article/view/38083</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijicle.v7i4.38083</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): December; 721-758</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8368</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijicle.v7i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/iccle/article/view/38083/8584</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Moh. Fadhil, Herman Herman (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>