Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Improving Law Student Ability on Legal Writing through Critical and Logical Thinking by IRAC Method

Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services · Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019) · hlm. 107–128

DOI
10.15294/ijals.v1i1.22799
ISSN
2686-2611, 2686-2085
Terbit
2019-09-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The lack of good stigma is attached to student activists, ranging from the unsatisfactory level of academic quality, graduating on time, not responsive and very reactive, hard and opposing views, to demonstrations that are colored by violence. The stigma is only in a few cases, not all activists face such conditions, but this stigma seems to have been far attached. The development of student activists today demands that activists must also have three literacy abilities: data literacy, humanitarian literacy, and technological literacy. However, based on the preliminary results of this activity, 90 percent of UNNES Law School student activists agreed that activists must have a critical attitude and critical writing skills, but only about 10 percent of activists who had taken it seriously (thought publications in various forms). This activity is aimed at developing the critical abilities of student activists through increased publications in various media. This activity also aims to establish a critical writing community for student activists and present a concrete forum for channeling ideas and solutions for student activists in writing that can be read by many people. This activity is carried out through a critical thinking approach in legal studies using the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) method which is commonly used in analyzing various cases in legal study thinking.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 173 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Bayangsari WedhatamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui16
Rasdi RasdiAfiliasi tidak diketahui13
Waspiah WaspiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Nadiyah Meyliana PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Ngboawaji Daniel NteAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Anis WidyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Septhian Eka AdiyatmaAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Muhammad Iqbal BaiquniAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Rodiyah RodiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Bintang Rafli AnantaAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Nurul FibriantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Dian LatifianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Ali MasyharAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Fitria DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Muhammad Wahyu Saiful HudaAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
R Benny RiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Asyaffa Ridzqi AmandhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Indah Sri UtariAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Muhammad Azil MaskurAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Sonny Saptoajie WicaksonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Karsinah KarsinahAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Riki JuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hafizh Daffa SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Robert Brian SmithAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Syaiful AminAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ahsana NadiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Asmarani RamliAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Layla Putri AulyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Raden Muhammad Arvy IlyasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Heni RosidaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Siti Hafsyah IdrisAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Umi AfiatunAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Izan Mateo CassandroAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ngaboawaji Daniel NteAfiliasi tidak diketahui3

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijals/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Improving Law Student Ability on Legal Writing through Critical and Logical Thinking by IRAC Method</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Arifin, Ridwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Alkadri, Riska</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sari, Dewi Puspa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Resthiningsih, Lilies</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Holish, Amarru Muftie</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">student activists; critical thinking;publications;legal writing</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The lack of good stigma is attached to student activists, ranging from the unsatisfactory level of academic quality, graduating on time, not responsive and very reactive, hard and opposing views, to demonstrations that are colored by violence. The stigma is only in a few cases, not all activists face such conditions, but this stigma seems to have been far attached. The development of student activists today demands that activists must also have three literacy abilities: data literacy, humanitarian literacy, and technological literacy. However, based on the preliminary results of this activity, 90 percent of UNNES Law School student activists agreed that activists must have a critical attitude and critical writing skills, but only about 10 percent of activists who had taken it seriously (thought publications in various forms). This activity is aimed at developing the critical abilities of student activists through increased publications in various media. This activity also aims to establish a critical writing community for student activists and present a concrete forum for channeling ideas and solutions for student activists in writing that can be read by many people. This activity is carried out through a critical thinking approach in legal studies using the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) method which is commonly used in analyzing various cases in legal study thinking.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijals/article/view/22799</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijals.v1i1.22799</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Strengthening Community and Legal Sector in Indonesia; 107-128</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2686-2611</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2686-2085</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijals.v1i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijals/article/view/22799/3383</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>