Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Speedy Trial in Election Crimes in Indonesia: Between Judicial Efficiency and Evidentiary Integrity

IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 953–984

DOI
10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.29811
ISSN
2548-1576, 2548-1568
Terbit
2025-11-08
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Speedy trials in regional election criminal cases are essential for maintaining democratic integrity, but they raise concerns about balancing efficiency with substantive justice. This study examines the implications of implementing speedy trial principles on evidence quality, access to justice, human rights protection, and judicial system integrity through normative legal analysis of primary sources. The research reveals that accelerated judicial processes create tensions between procedural speed and thoroughness, potentially compromising the examination of evidence, disadvantaging resource-limited defendants, and risking due process violations. The findings demonstrate that expedited timelines may undermine comprehensive legal reasoning in judicial decisions. A balanced framework is essential to achieve both procedural efficiency and substantive justice in electoral criminal proceedings.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

16 penulis · 30 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • State University of Malang
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Nur Hidayani AlimuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jusafri JusafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Riyan Kachfi BoerAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad As Ari AMUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Irabiah JunusAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syamsul BachriState University of Malang1
Muhammad BasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nizamuddin AliasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhamad Aksan AkbarUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Faisal Herisetiawan JafarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lade SirjonUniversitas Halu Oleo1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijcls/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Speedy Trial in Election Crimes in Indonesia: Between Judicial Efficiency and Evidentiary Integrity</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Riezka Eka Mayasari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sakti, La Ode Awal</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Siti Hudzaifah Miftahul Jannah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yahyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Eduardo Andres Cellis</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Election Crime</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Evidence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Speedy Trial</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Speedy trials in regional election criminal cases are essential for maintaining democratic integrity, but they raise concerns about balancing efficiency with substantive justice. This study examines the implications of implementing speedy trial principles on evidence quality, access to justice, human rights protection, and judicial system integrity through normative legal analysis of primary sources. The research reveals that accelerated judicial processes create tensions between procedural speed and thoroughness, potentially compromising the examination of evidence, disadvantaging resource-limited defendants, and risking due process violations. The findings demonstrate that expedited timelines may undermine comprehensive legal reasoning in judicial decisions. A balanced framework is essential to achieve both procedural efficiency and substantive justice in electoral criminal proceedings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-11-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijcls/article/view/29811</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.29811</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies); Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2025); 953-984</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1576</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1568</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijcls.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijcls/article/view/29811/6773</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Riezka Eka Mayasari, La Ode Awal Sakti, Siti Hudzaifah Miftahul Jannah, Yahyanto, Eduardo Andres Cellis (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>