Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Role of The Prosecutor as Executor of Court Decisions in Returning Confiscated Objects and State Spoils in Criminal Cases: Comparing Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, and Thailan

IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022) · hlm. 1–26

DOI
10.15294/ijcls.v7i1.38373
ISSN
2548-1576, 2548-1568
Terbit
2022-05-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The execution of court decisions especially for confiscated objects and state spoils face some challenges in Indonesia. This research aims to find out the the executive of court decisions in the return of evidence, as well as what factors affect the presecutor as the executor of the court’s decision. The research questions formulated as first, what is the role of the presecutor in carrying out of the execution of the court's verdict on the return of evidence? and second, what are the factors that affect the presecutor as the executor of the court's decision in the return of evidence? The research method used in this research is qualitative research method with a type of socio-legal studies. This research found and highlighted that the execution of the court’s decision on the status of the evidence carried out by the Prosecutor after the adjudicator's decision has been signed. There are four factors that influence the level of effectiveness of the Prosecutor as the executor of court decisions with regard to evidence, including the legal factor itself, the community factor, the law enforcement officer factor, as well as the legal facilities and facilities factor. Various regulations have been drafted, however, none of them have explicitly regulated the threat of sanctions for prosecutors who do not immediately carry out executions, lack of coordination between related parties, and limited legal facilities and facilities are factors that affect the effectiveness of prosecutors in carrying out their duties.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 131 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 37 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Novena University
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Universiti of Malaysia Sabah
  • Chiang Mai University
  • Niger Delta University
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ridwan ArifinState University of Semarang13
Dian LatifianiState University of Semarang7
Heru SetyantoState University of Semarang7
Rohadhatul AisyState University of Semarang6
Shofriya Qonitatin AbidahState University of Semarang5
Rasdi RasdiState University of Semarang5
Brebina Kelvin EnokeAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Ali MasyharState University of Semarang4
Lyna LatifahState University of Semarang3
Choirul FuadState University of Semarang3
Kelvin BribenaNiger Delta University3
Windiahsari WindiahsariNational Cheng Kung University3
Muhammad Azil MaskurState University of Semarang3
Zico Junius FernandoUniversity of Bengkulu3
Ade AdhariTarumanagara University3
Asyaffa Ridzqi AmandhaState University of Semarang3
Muhammad Iqbal BaiquniState University of Semarang3
Adilia Putri KusumaState University of Semarang2
Siti Amatil UlfiyahState University of Semarang2
Amel Ellsamia IndiyaniState University of Semarang2
Duhita Driyah SupraptiState University of Semarang2
Awal IsaNigerian Defence Academy2
Baba-Ahmadu AbdulazizNovena University2
Septhian Eka AdiyatmaState University of Semarang2
Diyah Satya RetnaniState University of Semarang2
Joda Adekunbi OmolaraNovena University2
Yulia Fajar RafikawatiState University of Semarang2
Wulan Saputri IndahState University of Semarang2
Dina Silvia PuteriState University of Semarang2
Denita Cahyanti WahonoUniversitas Airlangga2
Rr. Jannatul FirdausUniversitas Airlangga2
Didik PurnomoState University of Semarang2
Ali Masyhar MursyidState University of Semarang2
Indah Sri UtariState University of Semarang2
Rodiyah RodiyahState University of Semarang2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijcls/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Role of The Prosecutor as Executor of Court Decisions in Returning Confiscated Objects and State Spoils in Criminal Cases: Comparing Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, and Thailan</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Amir, Ameerah binti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hanifah, Wahyu Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Widyawati, Anis</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nte, Ngboawaji Daniel</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Smith, Arthur</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Prosecutor; Court Decisions; Evidence</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The execution of court decisions especially for confiscated objects and state spoils face some challenges in Indonesia. This research aims to find out the the executive of court decisions in the return of evidence, as well as what factors affect the presecutor as the executor of the court’s decision. The research questions formulated as&amp;nbsp;first,&amp;nbsp;what is the role of the presecutor in carrying out of the execution of the court's verdict on the return of evidence? and&amp;nbsp;second,&amp;nbsp;what are the factors that affect the presecutor as the executor of the court's decision in the return of evidence? The research method used in this research is qualitative research method with a type of socio-legal studies. This research found and highlighted that the execution of the court’s decision on the status of the evidence carried out by the Prosecutor after the adjudicator's decision has been signed. There are four factors that influence the level of effectiveness of the Prosecutor as the executor of court decisions with regard to evidence, including the legal factor itself, the community factor, the law enforcement officer factor, as well as the legal facilities and facilities factor. Various regulations have been drafted, however, none of them have explicitly regulated the threat of sanctions for prosecutors who do not immediately carry out executions, lack of coordination between related parties, and limited legal facilities and facilities are factors that affect the effectiveness of prosecutors in carrying out their duties.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-05-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijcls/article/view/38373</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijcls.v7i1.38373</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies); Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2022); 1-26</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1576</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1568</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/j73kmr22</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijcls/article/view/38373/7450</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>