Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Digital Constitutionalism: A Pancasila Framework in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Indonesian Journal of Pancasila & Global Constitutionalism · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 76–115

DOI
10.15294/ijpgc.v5i1.48383
ISSN
2830-0610, 2830-0629
Terbit
2026-06-28
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has fundamentally shifted the locus of power from sovereign states to opaque private algorithms, precipitating a critical need for robust digital constitutionalism. However, contemporary global AI governance is overwhelmingly dominated by Western paradigms—namely, the European rights-and-risk-based model and the US market-driven approach. While historically significant, these Eurocentric frameworks operate on hyper-individualistic epistemologies that prove structurally inadequate when transplanted to the Global South. They frequently fail to mitigate collective vulnerabilities, structural algorithmic bias, and the monopolistic extraction of data inherent in platform capitalism. Employing doctrinal legal research with conceptual and comparative constitutional methodologies, this article decolonizes the AI governance discourse by proposing Pancasila—Indonesia’s state philosophy—as a Communitarian-Religious Constitutional Framework. The study demonstrates that Pancasila transcends the limitations of secular-liberal models by synthesizing transcendental ethics, relational human dignity, democratic cohesion, and distributive justice. Specifically, the paper operationalizes the Indonesian Constitution to articulate a dual-pronged legal response: enforcing the Second Principle to combat structural algorithmic discrimination through substantive equality, and the Fifth Principle to dismantle Big Tech oligarchies via a constitutional economy. Ultimately, this research conceptualizes "Algorithmic Welfare Constitutionalism." It offers not merely a localized ideological critique, but a transformative normative grammar for post-colonial and developing nations, ensuring that algorithmic power remains unequivocally subservient to human dignity, collective solidarity, and equitable digital sovereignty.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

23 penulis · 65 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 17 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Sriwijaya University
  • National University of Malaysia
  • Sakarya University
  • The University of Melbourne
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muhammad Azil MaskurState University of Semarang4
Wildan Azkal FikriSriwijaya University3
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang2
Dheni Anugerah PrasetyaState University of Semarang2
Yustina Dhian NovitaState University of Semarang1
Muhamad Helmi Md SaidNational University of Malaysia1
Nurul FibriantiState University of Semarang1
Ridwan ArifinState University of Semarang1
R. Benny RiyantoState University of Semarang1
Karsinah KarsinahState University of Semarang1
Bintang Rafli AnantaState University of Semarang1
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahState University of Semarang1
Galih Niken Anggoto SulaksmiState University of Semarang1
Aisyah Nur RafidahSakarya University1
Venessa HuwaeJenderal Soedirman University1
Tedi SudrajatJenderal Soedirman University1
Tri Lisiani PrihatinahJenderal Soedirman University1
Duhita PandyaThe University of Melbourne1
Ali Masyhar MursyidState University of Semarang1
Safira Embun InsanidyaState University of Semarang1
Kayla Achri SalsabilaState University of Semarang1
Nafa Isma Nur FattihState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijpgc/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Digital Constitutionalism: A Pancasila Framework in the Era of Artificial Intelligence</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Indraswara, Dede</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Digital Constitutionalism</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Artificial Intelligence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pancasila</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Algorithmic Bias</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Big Tech Monopoly</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has fundamentally shifted the locus of power from sovereign states to opaque private algorithms, precipitating a critical need for robust digital constitutionalism. However, contemporary global AI governance is overwhelmingly dominated by Western paradigms—namely, the European rights-and-risk-based model and the US market-driven approach. While historically significant, these Eurocentric frameworks operate on hyper-individualistic epistemologies that prove structurally inadequate when transplanted to the Global South. They frequently fail to mitigate collective vulnerabilities, structural algorithmic bias, and the monopolistic extraction of data inherent in platform capitalism. Employing doctrinal legal research with conceptual and comparative constitutional methodologies, this article decolonizes the AI governance discourse by proposing Pancasila—Indonesia’s state philosophy—as a Communitarian-Religious Constitutional Framework. The study demonstrates that Pancasila transcends the limitations of secular-liberal models by synthesizing transcendental ethics, relational human dignity, democratic cohesion, and distributive justice. Specifically, the paper operationalizes the Indonesian Constitution to articulate a dual-pronged legal response: enforcing the Second Principle to combat structural algorithmic discrimination through substantive equality, and the Fifth Principle to dismantle Big Tech oligarchies via a constitutional economy. Ultimately, this research conceptualizes "Algorithmic Welfare Constitutionalism." It offers not merely a localized ideological critique, but a transformative normative grammar for post-colonial and developing nations, ensuring that algorithmic power remains unequivocally subservient to human dignity, collective solidarity, and equitable digital sovereignty.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijpgc/article/view/48383</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijpgc.v5i1.48383</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian Journal of Pancasila &amp; Global Constitutionalism; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June, 2026; 76-115</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2830-0610</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2830-0629</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijpgc.v5i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijpgc/article/view/48383/10330</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Dede Indraswara (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>