Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Prison and Non-Prison Sanctions in Cases of Defamation through Social Media

Indonesia Media Law Review · Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 118–150

DOI
10.15294/imrev.v4i1.33163
ISSN
2829-7423, 2829-7628
Terbit
2025-06-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The increase in online defamation in Indonesia in line with the growing number of internet users, which is often responded to with prison sentences of up to 4 years based on the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, has raised a debate regarding the effectiveness and proportionality of such punishments. This article aims to compare the effectiveness of prison sanctions versus non-prison sanctions such as fines, community service, and their alignment with the principles of restorative justice and the 2023 Criminal Code. The research method uses a comparative-normative approach by analyzing the rulings on defamation cases via Facebook, the ITE Law, and regulatory changes in the Criminal Code (Law No. 1/2023). The study results show that the defendants were sentenced to prison (2–8 months), only 3 received probation, the 2023 Criminal Code (effective 2026) abolishes prison sentences for minor offenses, switching to fines (maximum Rp10 million) or community service, online defamation has now become a complaint-based crime following the changes to the ITE Law in 2016. In conclusion, short-term prison sentences are less effective because they have the potential to sacrifice freedom of expression and have minimal preventive impact, while non-custodial sentences are more suitable for minor cases in line with the adoption of restorative justice. Recommendations include amendments to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) to integrate alternative sanctions of fines or community service, prioritizing mediation as a preliminary step, and socializing the limits of digital freedom.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 151 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Tokyo Metropolitan University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ridwan ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Rasdi RasdiAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Shofriya Qonitatin AbidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Dian LatifianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Septhian Eka AdiyatmaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Ali MasyharAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Rohadhatul AisyAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Muhammad Azil MaskurAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Heru SetyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ade AdhariAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Pujiyono PujiyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Lyna LatifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rahmawati Melati SaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Choirul FuadAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Raden Muhammad Arvy IlyasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Siti Amatil UlfiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Amel Ellsamia IndiyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Adilia Putri KusumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Duhita Driyah SupraptiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rafli Zidan Eka RamadhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Diyah Satya RetnaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Indah Sri UtariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Helda RahmasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Moh. Imam GusthomiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Daud Renata Candra RamadanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa Rena WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Adiba Ro'uf Danur IslamAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nur RochaetiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Leony Sondang SuryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Seni Ira Maya RasidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sonny Saptoajie WicaksonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ngboawaji Daniel NteAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Asyaffa Ridzqi AmandhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ngaboawaji Daniel NteAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Salman AlfarisiTokyo Metropolitan University1
Panggih Kusuma NingrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nike Natasya Dewi SumartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/imrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Prison and Non-Prison Sanctions in Cases of Defamation through Social Media</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Purnomo, Didik </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Widyawati, Anis </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kusuma, Bagus Hendradi </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">defamation, prison, criminal fine</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The increase in online defamation in Indonesia in line with the growing number of internet users, which is often responded to with prison sentences of up to 4 years based on the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, has raised a debate regarding the effectiveness and proportionality of such punishments. This article aims to compare the effectiveness of prison sanctions versus non-prison sanctions such as fines, community service, and their alignment with the principles of restorative justice and the 2023 Criminal Code. The research method uses a comparative-normative approach by analyzing the rulings on defamation cases via Facebook, the ITE Law, and regulatory changes in the Criminal Code (Law No. 1/2023). The study results show that the defendants were sentenced to prison (2–8 months), only 3 received probation, the 2023 Criminal Code (effective 2026) abolishes prison sentences for minor offenses, switching to fines (maximum Rp10 million) or community service, online defamation has now become a complaint-based crime following the changes to the ITE Law in 2016. In conclusion, short-term prison sentences are less effective because they have the potential to sacrifice freedom of expression and have minimal preventive impact, while non-custodial sentences are more suitable for minor cases in line with the adoption of restorative justice. Recommendations include amendments to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) to integrate alternative sanctions of fines or community service, prioritizing mediation as a preliminary step, and socializing the limits of digital freedom.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/imrev/article/view/33163</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/imrev.v4i1.33163</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesia Media Law Review; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025; 118-150</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-7423</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-7628</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/imrev/article/view/33163/6323</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Didik  Purnomo, Anis  Widyawati, Bagus Hendradi  Kusuma (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>