Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Filsafat Pendidikan Pancasila dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka: Analisis Komparatif Landasan Filosofis

Integralistik · Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 42–52

DOI
10.15294/integralistik.v37i1.34147
ISSN
2549-5011, 0853-7208
Terbit
2026-01-14
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Pancasila, as the state foundation and philosophical basis of national education mandated by the National Education System Law Article 2, should serve as an ontological, epistemological, and axiological foundation in every national curriculum. This study aims to analyze and compare the educational philosophy underlying two curriculums and assess the extent to which Pancasila’s educational philosophy is adopted as a philosophical basis. The method used comparative analysis of official curriculum documents, namely Permendikbud No. 57–59 of 2014 (2013 Curriculum) and Permendikbudristek No. 12 of 2024 and Permendikdasmen No. 13 of 2025 (Merdeka Curriculum). The analysis employed thematic content analysis across three dimensions: (1) Philosophical Foundation, (2) Integration of Pancasila, and (3) Philosophical Depth. Results show that the 2013 Curriculum is dominated by progressivism and essentialism philosophies, with partial and normative-moral integration of Pancasila limited to the first three principles. In contrast, the Merdeka Curriculum integrates Pancasila holistically across eight graduate profile dimensions, covering all principles and beginning to engage ontological, epistemological, and axiological levels through a deep learning approach. The Merdeka Curriculum aligns more closely with the idealistic philosophy of Pancasila education than the 2013 Curriculum. The findings imply a need for an explicit philosophical foundation in the curriculum and adequate teacher training so that Pancasila becomes a strong philosophical foundation rather than merely a normative message.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

20 penulis · 41 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 11 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung
  • Mulawarman University
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Universitas Jambi
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Asnath Maria FuahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuni Cahya EndrawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maria UlfahNational Research and Innovation Agency1
La Ode DzakirUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Muhammad Buttomi MasgodeUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Fathur Rahman RustanUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Al Tafakur LaodeUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Makrina TindangenMulawarman University1
Evie PalenewenMulawarman University1
Ugi NugrahaUniversitas Jambi1
Ely YuliawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Winarno WinarnoSebelas Maret University1
Muhammad BasirInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung1
Muhammad Nur AminInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa1
Ahmad FadholiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung1
Muhammad Saidun AnwarInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/integralistik/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Filsafat Pendidikan Pancasila dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka: Analisis Komparatif Landasan Filosofis</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Winarno, Winarno</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Heri Santoso </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yuyus Kardiman </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Muchtarom</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">educational philosophy; Pancasila; 2013 Curriculum; Merdeka Curriculum;philosophical foundation.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Pancasila, as the state foundation and philosophical basis of national education mandated by the National Education System Law Article 2, should serve as an ontological, epistemological, and axiological foundation in every national curriculum. This study aims to analyze and compare the educational philosophy underlying two curriculums and assess the extent to which Pancasila’s educational philosophy is adopted as a philosophical basis. The method used comparative analysis of official curriculum documents, namely Permendikbud No. 57–59 of 2014 (2013 Curriculum) and Permendikbudristek No. 12 of 2024 and Permendikdasmen No. 13 of 2025 (Merdeka Curriculum). The analysis employed thematic content analysis across three dimensions: (1) Philosophical Foundation, (2) Integration of Pancasila, and (3) Philosophical Depth. Results show that the 2013 Curriculum is dominated by progressivism and essentialism philosophies, with partial and normative-moral integration of Pancasila limited to the first three principles. In contrast, the Merdeka Curriculum integrates Pancasila holistically across eight graduate profile dimensions, covering all principles and beginning to engage ontological, epistemological, and axiological levels through a deep learning approach. The Merdeka Curriculum aligns more closely with the idealistic philosophy of Pancasila education than the 2013 Curriculum. The findings imply a need for an explicit philosophical foundation in the curriculum and adequate teacher training so that Pancasila becomes a strong philosophical foundation rather than merely a normative message.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-01-14</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/integralistik/article/view/34147</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/integralistik.v37i1.34147</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Integralistik; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): January 2026; 42-52</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-5011</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0853-7208</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/integralistik.v37i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/integralistik/article/view/34147/8072</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Integralistik</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>