Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Consent or Coercion? A Comparative Legal Analysis of Biometric Data Practices in Digital Banking Systems

Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 103–116

DOI
10.15294/ipmhi.v5i1.28731
ISSN
2807-8330, 2797-8508
Terbit
2025-07-18
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The digital revolution in the financial sector has accelerated the adoption of biometric technology as an authentication method, offering greater security and efficiency compared to traditional password or PIN-based systems. Biometric technology leverages unique physical or behavioral characteristics—such as fingerprints, facial patterns, and voice recognition—making it highly resistant to forgery. However, the use of biometrics introduces a fundamental paradox between enhanced security and the risk to personal privacy, as biometric data is immutable and, if compromised, the consequences are permanent and irreversible. Indonesia has addressed these challenges through the enactment of Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law), which classifies biometric data as specific personal data requiring explicit, written, and revocable consent. Despite this legal framework, implementation remains challenging due to the lack of sector-specific regulations and limited regulatory oversight. Comparatively, the European Union’s GDPR sets a high standard for biometric data protection, emphasizing explicit consent, data minimization, and strong enforcement. The United States adopts a sectoral approach, with state laws such as Illinois’ BIPA imposing strict requirements and significant liabilities. A central concern is whether consent obtained from consumers in banking truly meets legal standards, given the power imbalance between institutions and users. This study employs a normative juridical and comparative approach to analyze regulatory frameworks in Indonesia, the EU, and the US, identifying best practices and recommending improvements for biometric data protection in banking.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

15 penulis · 47 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • National University of Malaysia
  • Universitas Pekalongan
  • Novena University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang3
Sukadari SukadariState University of Semarang2
Winarsih WinarsihState University of Semarang1
Muhamad Sayuti HassanNational University of Malaysia1
Agung AdityaUniversitas Pekalongan1
Winarsih WinarsihState University of Semarang1
Ngboawaji Daniel NteNovena University1
Ridwan ArifinState University of Semarang1
Didik Setyo PurnomoState University of Semarang1
Asyaffa Ridzqi AmandhaState University of Semarang1
Mutmainah Nur QoiriState University of Semarang1
WinarsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nauli Pinorsinta PasaribuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jennifer Margareth Uliana SianiparAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Consent or Coercion? A Comparative Legal Analysis of Biometric Data Practices in Digital Banking Systems</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ari Rahmayani, Chanidia</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Personal Data Privacy, Biometric, Technology Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The digital revolution in the financial sector has accelerated the adoption of biometric technology as an authentication method, offering greater security and efficiency compared to traditional password or PIN-based systems. Biometric technology leverages unique physical or behavioral characteristics—such as fingerprints, facial patterns, and voice recognition—making it highly resistant to forgery. However, the use of biometrics introduces a fundamental paradox between enhanced security and the risk to personal privacy, as biometric data is immutable and, if compromised, the consequences are permanent and irreversible.
Indonesia has addressed these challenges through the enactment of Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law), which classifies biometric data as specific personal data requiring explicit, written, and revocable consent. Despite this legal framework, implementation remains challenging due to the lack of sector-specific regulations and limited regulatory oversight. Comparatively, the European Union’s GDPR sets a high standard for biometric data protection, emphasizing explicit consent, data minimization, and strong enforcement. The United States adopts a sectoral approach, with state laws such as Illinois’ BIPA imposing strict requirements and significant liabilities.
A central concern is whether consent obtained from consumers in banking truly meets legal standards, given the power imbalance between institutions and users. This study employs a normative juridical and comparative approach to analyze regulatory frameworks in Indonesia, the EU, and the US, identifying best practices and recommending improvements for biometric data protection in banking.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-07-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/article/view/28731</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ipmhi.v5i1.28731</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025); 103-116</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-8330</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2797-8508</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ipmhi.v5i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/article/view/28731/4977</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/article/view/28731/4978</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>