Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Criminal Policy of Indonesian Criminal Law in Combating the Crime of Phishing

Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal · Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 297–314

DOI
10.15294/ipmhi.v5i2.38656
ISSN
2807-8330, 2797-8508
Terbit
2026-02-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Phishing is one of the forms of cybercrime that is increasingly widespread in Indonesia. However, to date, there is no legislation that explicitly defines phishing as an independent criminal offense. On one hand, this progress offers convenience and efficiency; on the other hand, it gives rise to new challenges that cannot be ignored, one of which is cybercrime. Law enforcement against perpetrators still relies on general provisions in the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law Number 1 Of 2024 Concerning The Second Amendment Of Law Number 11 Of 2008 On Information And Electronic Transactions. which are considered insufficient to fully address the complexity of phishing modus operandi. This results in suboptimal prosecution processes and inadequate legal protection for victims. In contrast to Indonesia, the United States has established more specific and comprehensive regulations concerning phishing, supported by integrated law enforcement agencies. Using Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory, it can be concluded that phishing regulations in Indonesia are still ineffective in terms of legal substance, institutional structure, and the public's legal culture. A comprehensive legal reform is needed to appropriately respond to the evolving dynamics of digital crime.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

5 penulis · 7 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Diajeng Maurien Rachma Ayu QueentaniaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Criminal Policy of Indonesian Criminal Law in Combating the Crime of Phishing</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Muhammad Reza Faturahman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Qonitatin Abidah, Shofriya </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Saptoajie Wicaksono, Sonny </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Khoirunnisa, Nisrina </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Phishing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Criminal Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Indonesia</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Phishing is one of the forms of cybercrime that is increasingly widespread in Indonesia. However, to date, there is no legislation that explicitly defines phishing as an independent criminal offense. On  one hand, this progress offers convenience and efficiency; on the other hand, it gives rise to new challenges that cannot be ignored, one of which is cybercrime. Law enforcement against perpetrators still relies on general provisions in the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law Number 1 Of 2024 Concerning The Second Amendment Of Law Number 11 Of 2008 On Information And Electronic Transactions. which are considered insufficient to fully address the complexity of phishing modus operandi. This results in suboptimal prosecution processes and inadequate legal protection for victims. In contrast to Indonesia, the United States has established more specific and comprehensive regulations concerning phishing, supported by integrated law enforcement agencies. Using Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory, it can be concluded that phishing regulations in Indonesia are still ineffective in terms of legal substance, institutional structure, and the public's legal culture. A comprehensive legal reform is needed to appropriately respond to the evolving dynamics of digital crime.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-02-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/article/view/38656</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ipmhi.v5i2.38656</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): June - December (Law in Transition: Contemporary Legal Challenges in a Changing World); 297-314</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-8330</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2797-8508</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ipmhi.v5i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/article/view/38656/8534</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 IPMHI Law Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>