Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Can the Erga Omnes Principle Revolutionize State Administrative Courts? A Challenge Through Lawrence M. Friedman’s Legal System Theory

Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 75–92

DOI
10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18870
ISSN
2654-8763, 2654-3125
Terbit
2025-03-25
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The principle of erga omnes, which signifies obligations binding on all parties, has traditionally been associated with international law and human rights. However, its application within state administrative courts remains an underexplored and provocative area of legal theory. This study delves into whether the erga omnes principle can be adapted to revolutionize Indonesia’s State Administrative Court (PTUN) system, drawing on Lawrence M. Friedman’s Legal System Theory as a framework. Friedman’s theory, which emphasizes the interaction of legal rules, legal culture, and the legal environment, offers an insightful lens to analyze the broader implications of applying erga omnes in the domestic administrative context. The findings suggest that while the erga omnes principle could significantly strengthen the role of state administrative courts in ensuring broader societal justice, its implementation presents notable challenges. These challenges include the difficulty in aligning domestic legal systems with the universal and binding nature of erga omnes, the risk of overwhelming courts with cases that require systemic change, and the potential for conflicting interpretations of the principle's scope. Despite these challenges, the study proposes that strategically applying erga omnes could enhance legal coherence, public trust, and accountability in administrative decision-making. This research challenges conventional thinking by proposing an audacious application of international legal principles to domestic administrative law. It provides fresh insights into how judicial reform could reshape the PTUN system, urging policymakers and legal scholars to rethink the boundaries of state administrative justice in Indonesia.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 123 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 29 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Novena University
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Pratama Herry HerlambangState University of Semarang8
Masyita Isnadya Risky SalsabilaState University of Semarang3
Ngboawaji Daniel NteNovena University3
Muhammad Adymas Hikal FikriState University of Semarang3
Aprila NiravitaState University of Semarang2
Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad SabriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Pangestu KhoirunisaState University of Semarang2
Dina Silvia PuteriState University of Semarang2
Denita Cahyanti WahonoUniversitas Airlangga2
Rr. Jannatul FirdausUniversitas Airlangga2
Yustina Dhian NovitaState University of Semarang2
Rizqan NaelufarState University of Semarang2
Farrel Ardan RinaldiState University of Semarang1
Marlina Dewi SetianiState University of Semarang1
Salsabila TriandaniState University of Semarang1
Ali MasyharState University of Semarang1
Ridwan ArifinState University of Semarang1
Rohadhatul AisyState University of Semarang1
Asmarani RamliState University of Semarang1
Anis WidyawatiState University of Semarang1
Daud Renata Candra RamadanState University of Semarang1
Zulfa Rena WijayantiState University of Semarang1
Adiba Ro'uf Danur IslamState University of Semarang1
Berlian Daliani Zora RafiState University of Semarang1
Faridhotun RidhoState University of Semarang1
Arif HidayatState University of Semarang1
Martitah MartitahState University of Semarang1
Tegar Islami PutraState University of Semarang1
Rahmawati Mohd YusoffUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Niken SeptianiState University of Semarang1
Ristina YudhantiState University of Semarang1
Dina RistantiState University of Semarang1
Gabriel Aditya Permana SState University of Semarang1
Deva Sakti SusmanaState University of Semarang1
Halim RahmansahState University of Semarang1
Eva Cornelia PutriState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Can the Erga Omnes Principle Revolutionize State Administrative Courts? A Challenge Through Lawrence M. Friedman’s Legal System Theory</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mayaka, Raphael Bertrand</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sulistiyono, Tri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Gusthomi, Moh. Imam</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Windiahsari, Windiahsari</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Erga Omnes</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">State Administrative Courts</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal System Theory</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Judicial Reform</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Indonesia Legal System</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The principle of erga omnes, which signifies obligations binding on all parties, has traditionally been associated with international law and human rights. However, its application within state administrative courts remains an underexplored and provocative area of legal theory. This study delves into whether the erga omnes principle can be adapted to revolutionize Indonesia’s State Administrative Court (PTUN) system, drawing on Lawrence M. Friedman’s Legal System Theory as a framework. Friedman’s theory, which emphasizes the interaction of legal rules, legal culture, and the legal environment, offers an insightful lens to analyze the broader implications of applying erga omnes in the domestic administrative context. The findings suggest that while the erga omnes principle could significantly strengthen the role of state administrative courts in ensuring broader societal justice, its implementation presents notable challenges. These challenges include the difficulty in aligning domestic legal systems with the universal and binding nature of erga omnes, the risk of overwhelming courts with cases that require systemic change, and the potential for conflicting interpretations of the principle's scope. Despite these challenges, the study proposes that strategically applying erga omnes could enhance legal coherence, public trust, and accountability in administrative decision-making. This research challenges conventional thinking by proposing an audacious application of international legal principles to domestic administrative law. It provides fresh insights into how judicial reform could reshape the PTUN system, urging policymakers and legal scholars to rethink the boundaries of state administrative justice in Indonesia.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-03-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/article/view/18870</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18870</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev); Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Indonesian State Law Review, October 2024; 75-92</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-8763</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-3125</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/islrev.v7i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/article/view/18870/6418</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Raphael Bertrand Mayaka, Tri Sulistiyono, Moh. Imam Gusthomi, Windiahsari Windiahsari</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>