Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Is the Separation of State Attorneys the Key to Legal Reform in State Administrative Courts?

Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 93–108

DOI
10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18872
ISSN
2654-8763, 2654-3125
Terbit
2025-03-25
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The role of state attorneys in administrative justice has long been a topic of debate, particularly in the context of Indonesia’s State Administrative Court (PTUN). Currently, state attorneys serve as both legal representatives for the government and as the public prosecutor in administrative disputes. This dual function has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and inefficiencies in the judicial process. This research explores the concept of separating the roles of state attorneys in the PTUN as a potential bridge for legal reform, with the aim of improving impartiality, transparency, and efficiency in state administrative disputes. Using a normative juridical approach, the study examines the advantages and challenges of creating a clear distinction between the roles of government legal counsel and public prosecutors in administrative cases. The findings suggest that such a separation could reduce conflicts of interest, enhance fairness in the adjudication process, and promote a more balanced approach to administrative justice. However, the implementation of this reform faces practical challenges, such as institutional resistance and the need for legislative changes. The novelty of this research lies in its exploration of a structural reform within the Indonesian administrative justice system, offering a fresh perspective on improving the independence and credibility of state administrative courts. The urgency of this reform is emphasized by the growing need for a more transparent and efficient judicial system that can meet the demands of modern governance. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on legal reform in Indonesia and provides recommendations for policymakers aiming to strengthen the administrative justice system.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

26 penulis · 79 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ali MasyharAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Windiahsari WindiahsariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aprila NiravitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Salsabila TriandaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang2
Ridwan ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Michael Timothy NapitupuluAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Destashya Wisna Diraya PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nadiyah Meyliana PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar1
Muhamad Sayuti HassanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anggyi Trisnawan PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rohadhatul AisyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wildan Azkal FikriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SyahwalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lita Tyesta Addy Listya WardhaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sekar Anggun Gading PinilihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ristina YudhantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh. Imam GusthomiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dina RistantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gabriel Aditya Permana SAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Deva Sakti SusmanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Halim RahmansahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Is the Separation of State Attorneys the Key to Legal Reform in State Administrative Courts?</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sipahutar, Cornelius Samuel</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Emha, Zidney Ilma Fazaada</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Naelufar, Rizqan</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">State Attorneys</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal Reform</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">State Administrative Court</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Conflict of Interest</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Judicial Independence</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The role of state attorneys in administrative justice has long been a topic of debate, particularly in the context of Indonesia’s State Administrative Court (PTUN). Currently, state attorneys serve as both legal representatives for the government and as the public prosecutor in administrative disputes. This dual function has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and inefficiencies in the judicial process. This research explores the concept of separating the roles of state attorneys in the PTUN as a potential bridge for legal reform, with the aim of improving impartiality, transparency, and efficiency in state administrative disputes. Using a normative juridical approach, the study examines the advantages and challenges of creating a clear distinction between the roles of government legal counsel and public prosecutors in administrative cases. The findings suggest that such a separation could reduce conflicts of interest, enhance fairness in the adjudication process, and promote a more balanced approach to administrative justice. However, the implementation of this reform faces practical challenges, such as institutional resistance and the need for legislative changes. The novelty of this research lies in its exploration of a structural reform within the Indonesian administrative justice system, offering a fresh perspective on improving the independence and credibility of state administrative courts. The urgency of this reform is emphasized by the growing need for a more transparent and efficient judicial system that can meet the demands of modern governance. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on legal reform in Indonesia and provides recommendations for policymakers aiming to strengthen the administrative justice system.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-03-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/article/view/18872</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18872</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev); Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Indonesian State Law Review, October 2024; 93-108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-8763</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-3125</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/islrev.v7i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/article/view/18872/6420</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Cornelius Samuel Sipahutar, Zidney Ilma Fazaada Emha, Rizqan Naelufar</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>