Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

AI in Administrative Dispute Resolution: Exploring Opportunities and Risks

Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 137–146

DOI
10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18877
ISSN
2654-8763, 2654-3125
Terbit
2025-03-25
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the resolution of administrative disputes presents both significant opportunities and potential risks within the legal framework. As administrative courts globally face growing caseloads and demands for faster, more efficient decision-making, AI offers a promising solution for enhancing the speed, accuracy, and consistency of legal processes. This research explores the potential applications of AI in Indonesia's administrative justice system, focusing on its role in case management, decision support, and predictive analytics. The findings highlight several key opportunities, including AI’s potential to streamline case processing, reduce human error, and improve access to justice by automating routine tasks. Additionally, AI can help predict legal outcomes based on data-driven insights, offering both practitioners and courts valuable tools to enhance decision-making. However, the study also identifies significant risks, such as the potential for bias in algorithmic decision-making, lack of transparency, and concerns over the loss of human oversight in critical legal decisions. These risks may undermine the fairness and accountability of administrative dispute resolution. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the intersection of AI and administrative law, offering a fresh perspective on how emerging technologies can be harnessed to improve judicial efficiency while addressing the inherent challenges. The urgency of this exploration is underscored by the increasing demand for reforms in administrative justice systems. This study contributes valuable insights for policymakers and legal professionals on how to balance innovation with safeguards to ensure AI’s responsible and equitable use in administrative dispute resolution.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

27 penulis · 86 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ridwan ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Didik PurnomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Siti Hafsyah IdrisAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Anis WidyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rohadhatul AisyAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Shofriya Qonitatin AbidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rafli Zidan Eka RamadhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rifqi Anugrah TamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mohamad IkromAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Edward DixonAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Layla Putri AulyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad SabriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fateema MuslihatunAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fateema Muslihatun NajihahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Azil MaskurAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali MasyharAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilia WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wildan Azkal FikriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Benny SumardianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tajudeen SaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pujiyono PujiyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Izan Mateo CassandroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Barda Nawawi AriefAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rully NasrullohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">AI in Administrative Dispute Resolution: Exploring Opportunities and Risks</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wibowo, Esa Maulana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nte, Ngaboawaji Daniel</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kusuma, Bagus Hendradi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Artificial Intelligence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Administrative Disputes</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal Innovation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Judicial Efficiency</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Risk and Ethics</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the resolution of administrative disputes presents both significant opportunities and potential risks within the legal framework. As administrative courts globally face growing caseloads and demands for faster, more efficient decision-making, AI offers a promising solution for enhancing the speed, accuracy, and consistency of legal processes. This research explores the potential applications of AI in Indonesia's administrative justice system, focusing on its role in case management, decision support, and predictive analytics. The findings highlight several key opportunities, including AI’s potential to streamline case processing, reduce human error, and improve access to justice by automating routine tasks. Additionally, AI can help predict legal outcomes based on data-driven insights, offering both practitioners and courts valuable tools to enhance decision-making. However, the study also identifies significant risks, such as the potential for bias in algorithmic decision-making, lack of transparency, and concerns over the loss of human oversight in critical legal decisions. These risks may undermine the fairness and accountability of administrative dispute resolution. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the intersection of AI and administrative law, offering a fresh perspective on how emerging technologies can be harnessed to improve judicial efficiency while addressing the inherent challenges. The urgency of this exploration is underscored by the increasing demand for reforms in administrative justice systems. This study contributes valuable insights for policymakers and legal professionals on how to balance innovation with safeguards to ensure AI’s responsible and equitable use in administrative dispute resolution.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-03-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/article/view/18877</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/islrev.v7i2.18877</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev); Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Indonesian State Law Review, October 2024; 137-146</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-8763</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-3125</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/islrev.v7i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/article/view/18877/6423</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Esa Maulana Wibowo, Ngaboawaji Daniel Nte, Bagus Hendradi Kusuma</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>