Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Optimization of Naïve Bayes Method using Genetic Algorithm to Diagnose Cattle Disease

Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020) · hlm. 41–50

DOI
10.15294/jaist.v2i1.44367
ISSN
2715-999X, 2714-9714
Terbit
2020-04-30
Penerbit
Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Technological advances that so fast encourage people to create a breakthrough, one of which is the expert system. An expert system can be used to solve problems in diagnosing disease problems, one of which is cattle disease. Lack of knowledge of breeders regarding this can result in considerable losses to the breeder. An expert system is needed to diagnose cow disease. The method that can be used to create an expert system is the Naïve Bayes method. The naïve Bayes method is a classification with probability methods and statistics to predict future opportunities based on previous experience. But there are weaknesses; namely, the independence feature is often wrong, and the probability estimation results cannot be optimal. To overcome this problem, one way is to use Genetic Algorithms. Genetic algorithms are random search forms that mimic the principle of natural biological evolution processes to find optimal solutions. The number of attributes used is 24 attributes consisting of the name of the disease and 23 symptoms. The accuracy of using the Naïve Bayes method is 90%, while the accuracy of using the Naïve Bayes and Genetic Algorithm is 95%. It can be concluded that there is an accuracy increase of 5%.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 97 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 8 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Alamsyah AlamsyahState University of Semarang5
Amin SuyitnoState University of Semarang5
Dwijanto DwijantoState University of Semarang4
Florentina Yuni AriniState University of Semarang3
Rochmad RochmadInternational Islamic University Malaysia3
Kholiq BudimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Untsa Zaaidatunni'mahState University of Semarang2
Novanka Agnes SekartajiState University of Semarang2
Irfan Fajar MuttaqinState University of Semarang2
Nuril AsyrofiyyahState University of Semarang2
Ramadhan Ridho ArrohmanState University of Semarang2
Dany PradanaState University of Semarang2
Putriaji HendikawatiState University of Semarang2
Amin SuyitnoState University of Semarang2
Budi PrasetiyoState University of Semarang2
Much Aziz MuslimState University of Semarang2
Jumanto JumantoState University of Semarang2
Rofik RofikState University of Semarang2
Anggyi Trisnawan PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
zaenal abidinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yahya Nur IfrizaState University of Semarang2
Isa AkhlisState University of Semarang2
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang1
Stephani Diah PamelasariState University of Semarang1
Arka YanitamaState University of Semarang1
Melissa Salma DarmawanState University of Semarang1
Aji SaputraUniversitas PGRI Palembang1
Desy Fitria AstutianingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syafa Nabilah SyahputraState University of Semarang1
Anggyi Trisnawan PutraState University of Semarang1
Athoillah AthoillahState University of Semarang1
Tiffany Ovilia Dwi LestariState University of Semarang1
Chairun NisakState University of Semarang1
Kevin Tito HutahaeanState University of Semarang1
Defa RiandinaState University of Semarang1
Anggoro Sakti AnindhitoState University of Semarang1
Fajar SujitoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jaist/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Optimization of Naïve Bayes Method using Genetic Algorithm to Diagnose Cattle Disease</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Firmansyah, Safit</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sugiharti, Endang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Arifudin, Riza</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Technological advances that so fast encourage people to create a breakthrough, one of which is the expert system. An expert system can be used to solve problems in diagnosing disease problems, one of which is cattle disease. Lack of knowledge of breeders regarding this can result in considerable losses to the breeder. An expert system is needed to diagnose cow disease. The method that can be used to create an expert system is the Naïve Bayes method. The naïve Bayes method is a classification with probability methods and statistics to predict future opportunities based on previous experience. But there are weaknesses; namely, the independence feature is often wrong, and the probability estimation results cannot be optimal. To overcome this problem, one way is to use Genetic Algorithms. Genetic algorithms are random search forms that mimic the principle of natural biological evolution processes to find optimal solutions. The number of attributes used is 24 attributes consisting of the name of the disease and 23 symptoms. The accuracy of using the Naïve Bayes method is 90%, while the accuracy of using the Naïve Bayes and Genetic Algorithm is 95%. It can be concluded that there is an accuracy increase of 5%.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jaist/article/view/44367</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jaist.v2i1.44367</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology; Vol 2 No 1 (2020): April; 41-50</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-999X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2714-9714</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jaist.v2i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jaist/article/view/44367/18057</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>