Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Comparative Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 OpenVPN Protocol Performance Based on QoS Parameters

Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology · Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021) · hlm. 53–60

DOI
10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49095
ISSN
2715-999X, 2714-9714
Terbit
2021-04-14
Penerbit
Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Network security is still a big concern in data exchange because it involves users' data privacy. There are several ways to secure data exchange on the internet. One of them uses a Virtual Private Network (VPN), which functions as a tunnel in the public internet that securely connects users to the local network. This research will analyze the performance of the OpenVPN IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. The method used to determine the performance results is based on the QoS parameters. The performance analysis results obtained are throughput OpenVPN IPv6 is better, namely 198.155 Kbps on ICMP data packets, 35.704 Kbps on FTP data packets, and 17.698 on TCP data packets. The delay value of OpenVPN in IPv4 is superior, namely 1.4s for ICMP data packets, and on IPv6, FTP data packages are superior with 0.1s. Jitter values indicate OpenVPN IPv6 is better with similar results. Packet loss values on OpenVPN for both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols are 0%. Based on these results, throughput IPv6 OpenVPN on ICMP data packets and delay on FTP data packets is better than IPv4 OpenVPN.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

39 penulis · 76 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muh. SholehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Martanto Setyo HusodoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Riza ArifudinState University of Semarang2
Deonisius Germandy Cahaya PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Vivi WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Resta AdityatamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Taripar Matius AlexanderAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Florentina Yuni AriniState University of Semarang1
Athoillah AthoillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endang SugihartiState University of Semarang1
Kholiq BudimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
zaenal abidinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alfath YanuartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dinar Diaz SeptianAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Akhmad MunawarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andika Enggal RamadhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bhekti KumorowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar1
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang1
Muhamad Sayuti HassanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zidney Ilma Fazaada EmhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Angel Novita SinuratAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tazkiyatun Aeni AmaliyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Devi Tri WidyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Much Azis MuslimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad WarsunAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syehudin SyehudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alamsyah AlamsyahState University of Semarang1
Hendi SusantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisya Dira PrastiwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adham Satria FirmansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Luthfi Ilham Agus PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Zaenal MuttaqinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Tri WiyantiState University of Semarang1
Dante AlighiriState University of Semarang1
Priyantini WidiyaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jaist/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Comparative Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 OpenVPN Protocol Performance Based on QoS Parameters</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kristianto, Pradistia Edo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Putra, Anggyi Trisnawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Network security is still a big concern in data exchange because it involves users' data privacy. There are several ways to secure data exchange on the internet. One of them uses a Virtual Private Network (VPN), which functions as a tunnel in the public internet that securely connects users to the local network. This research will analyze the performance of the OpenVPN IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. The method used to determine the performance results is based on the QoS parameters. The performance analysis results obtained are throughput OpenVPN IPv6 is better, namely 198.155 Kbps on ICMP data packets, 35.704 Kbps on FTP data packets, and 17.698 on TCP data packets. The delay value of OpenVPN in IPv4 is superior, namely 1.4s for ICMP data packets, and on IPv6, FTP data packages are superior with 0.1s. Jitter values indicate OpenVPN IPv6 is better with similar results. Packet loss values on OpenVPN for both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols are 0%. Based on these results, throughput IPv6 OpenVPN on ICMP data packets and delay on FTP data packets is better than IPv4 OpenVPN.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-04-14</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jaist/article/view/49095</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49095</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology; Vol 3 No 1 (2021): April; 53-60</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-999X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2714-9714</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jaist.v3i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jaist/article/view/49095/19794</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>