Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which is Best for Instant Messaging?

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 6 No. 3 (2016)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v6i3.pp909-914
ISSN
2088-8708, 2088-8708
Published
2016-06-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

There are many free instant messengers available now which allow to communicate with friends with text, phone call, video, sharing of files, in group or not and keep contact with them even internationally. But only very few of the instant messengers have gained a popularity and attention. Recent studies have shown that the most popular instant messengers are WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram. Even, Facebook acquired WhatsApp due to have huge users. Viber is another messenger with many integrated features that allows the phone calls and sends the text messages for free and there is no subscription like WhatsApp. While Telegram offers the users an open-source platform with no ads, a clean fast interface, asks for no payments whatsoever and the biggest selling point is security. WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which instant messenger is best? The popularity of Telegram has reached at the top of Google play store and become the most downloaded messaging app in the world today. But at the moment WhatsApp is still the winner!

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 90 co-authorship links · 46 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Diponegoro University
  • Sriwijaya University
  • Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nik Rumzi Nik IdrisUniversity of Technology Malaysia9
Mohammad JannatiUniversity of Technology Malaysia9
Mohd Hatta JopriUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka8
Mohd Junaidi Abdul AzizUniversity of Technology Malaysia7
Mustafa ManapUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka7
Awang JusohUniversity of Technology Malaysia7
Abdul Rahim AbdullahUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka6
M. Rahimi YusoffUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka4
Muhammad AdoUniversity of Technology Malaysia4
Shahreen binti KasimTun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia4
Mahmoud ZadehbagheriIslamic Azad University, Tehran3
Mohammad Javad KianiIslamic Azad University, Tehran3
Vahdat NazerianUniversity of Mazandaran3
Auzani JidinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Teguh Budi PrakosoDiponegoro University2
Irawan D SukawatiAffiliation unknown2
Darjat DarjatAffiliation unknown2
M. GhanbariAffiliation unknown2
M. Najafi KhoshrodiAffiliation unknown2
A.S. HussinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Mohd Ruddin Ab GhaniUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka2
Mehdi DadkhahIslamic Azad University, Tehran2
Shahaboddin ShamshirbandUniversity of Malaya2
Ahmad Saudi SamosirLampung University2
Ali AjamiAffiliation unknown2
Chibuike Peter OhanuUniversity of Nigeria2
Rahmat BudiartoAl Baha University2
Aiman Zakwan JidinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka1
Kee Jiar YeoUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Haikal SatriaUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Shih-Hui LeeUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Chia Keat YapUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Rozana AlikUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
I Gede YusaUdayana University1
Dewi BungaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which is Best for Instant Messaging?</dc:title><dc:creator>Sutikno, Tole</dc:creator><dc:creator>Handayani, Lina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stiawan, Deris</dc:creator><dc:creator>Riyadi, Munawar Agus</dc:creator><dc:creator>Much Ibnu Subroto, Imam</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;There are many free instant messengers available now which allow to communicate with friends with text, phone call, video, sharing of files, in group or not and keep contact with them even internationally. But only very few of the instant messengers have gained a popularity and attention. Recent studies have shown that the most popular instant messengers are WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram. Even, Facebook acquired WhatsApp due to have huge users. Viber is another messenger with many integrated features that allows the phone calls and sends the text messages for free and there is no subscription like WhatsApp. While Telegram offers the users an open-source platform with no ads, a clean fast interface, asks for no payments whatsoever and the biggest selling point is security. WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which instant messenger is best? The popularity of Telegram has reached at the top of Google play store and become the most downloaded messaging app in the world today. But at the moment WhatsApp is still the winner!&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2016-06-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v6i3.pp909-914</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v6i3.pp909-914</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 6 No 3 (2016); 909</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/443/328</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>