Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Comparative Analysis of NIJ and NIST Methods for MicroSD Investigations: A Technopreneur Approach

Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024) · hlm. 169–181

DOI
10.34306/att.v6i2.407
ISSN
2656-8888, 2655-8807
Terbit
2024-07-11
Penerbit
Pandawan
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This research aims to compare the performance of two forensic investigation methods, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), specifically for evidence analysis of MicroSD cards. MicroSD cards are frequently used as external storage in various digital devices, making them critical in digital forensic investigations. The study evaluates the effectiveness of these methods using tools such as Access Data FTK Imager and autopsy. The NIJ method enthis comparative passes detailed stages of preparation, collection, examination, analysis, and reporting, while the NIST method includes stages of collection, examination, analysis, and reporting. Results indicate that the NIJ method provides more comprehensive and detailed results, while the NIST method offers a faster investigation process. Additionally, tables and graphs illustrating performance metrics are included to substantiate the findings. This comparative analysis provides valuable insights for technopreneurs in optimizing digital forensic methods for better data integrity and efficiency, ultimately enhancing decision-making processes in technological entrepreneurship. Furthermore, this study aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, by promoting innovative forensic methods that support the development of resilient infrastructure and foster innovation in the digital age. This study highlights the importance of effective forensic methods in supporting technopreneurial ventures.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

28 penulis · 65 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Budi TjahjonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Irsan Nur HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Dzulfiqar FirdausAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ummanah UmmanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Haris FebriantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Malabay MalabayAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Destian GilangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kundang KarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Desy PrastyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rilla GantinoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endang RuswantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lukman CahyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Edward Boris P ManurungAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dewi Immaniar DesriantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daelami AhmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kholipatul AwaliyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ankur Singh BistAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Noor Azura ZakariaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Greisy JacquelineAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Li Wei MingAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Henrik JensenAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rio Wahyudin AnugrahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://att.aptisi.or.id/index.php/att/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Comparative Analysis of NIJ and NIST Methods for MicroSD Investigations: A Technopreneur Approach</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anwar, Nizirwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Widodo, Agung Mulyo </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sekti, Binastya Anggara</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ulum, Muhamad Bahrul </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rahaman, Mosiur </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ariessanti, Hani Dewi </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Digital Forensics</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">National Institute of Justice (NIJ)</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">MicroSD</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Technopreneurship</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This research aims to compare the performance of two forensic investigation methods, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), specifically for evidence analysis of MicroSD cards. MicroSD cards are frequently used as external storage in various digital devices, making them critical in digital forensic investigations. The study evaluates the effectiveness of these methods using tools such as Access Data FTK Imager and autopsy. The NIJ method enthis comparative passes detailed stages of preparation, collection, examination, analysis, and reporting, while the NIST method includes stages of collection, examination, analysis, and reporting. Results indicate that the NIJ method provides more comprehensive and detailed results, while the NIST method offers a faster investigation process. Additionally, tables and graphs illustrating performance metrics are included to substantiate the findings. This comparative analysis provides valuable insights for technopreneurs in optimizing digital forensic methods for better data integrity and efficiency, ultimately enhancing decision-making processes in technological entrepreneurship. Furthermore, this study aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, by promoting innovative forensic methods that support the development of resilient infrastructure and foster innovation in the digital age. This study highlights the importance of effective forensic methods in supporting technopreneurial ventures.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Pandawan</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-07-11</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://att.aptisi.or.id/index.php/att/article/view/407</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.34306/att.v6i2.407</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT); Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): July; 169-181</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Aptisi Transactions On Technopreneurship (ATT); Vol 6 No 2 (2024): July; 169-181</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2656-8888</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2655-8807</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.34306/att.v6i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://att.aptisi.or.id/index.php/att/article/view/407/255</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Nizirwan Anwar, Agung Mulyo Widodo, Binastya Anggara Sekti, Muhamad Bahrul Ulum, Mosiur Rahaman, Hani Dewi Ariessanti</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>