Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Evaluating Validity and Reliability of Scientific Literacy Among Indonesian Secondary Students in PISA 2015 Context: Rasch Model Analysis

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024) · hlm. 169–179

ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Terbit
2024-08-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Indonesia has followed the Scientific Literacy Test in PISA OECD and the rank is at the bottom. Scientific literacy is important things in science education because it involves the skills of scientific thinking in society life. This study aims to find the validity and reliability of scientific literacy in PISA 2015 using the Rasch model. The method of this research used quantitative survey research that assessed 15 years of 92 secondary school students. The validity in general shows the test items are not valid, but the validity in each test item shows 17 of 20 questions are valid. Reliability in person is lower than reliability in items. Even though, the test items still have good quality from the reliability findings. The novelty of this study is the validity and reliability of the PISA 2015 test items in Indonesian students as the sample. PISA 2015 used scientific literacy as the dominant test at that time. This study has benefitted other researchers by showing the importance of the validity and reliability of the instruments and ensuring the quality of the instruments for other researchers who will conduct future research using good validity and reliable instruments.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

3 penulis · 3 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jere/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Evaluating Validity and Reliability of Scientific Literacy Among Indonesian Secondary Students in PISA 2015 Context: Rasch Model Analysis</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Saputra, Winata Tegar Saputra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nuryani Rustaman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Lilit Rusyati</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Scientific Literacy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Rasch Model</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Validity</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Reliability</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Instrument</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Indonesia has followed the Scientific Literacy Test in PISA OECD and the rank is at the bottom. Scientific literacy is important things in science education because it involves the skills of scientific thinking in society life. This study aims to find the validity and reliability of scientific literacy in PISA 2015 using the Rasch model. The method of this research used quantitative survey research that assessed 15 years of 92 secondary school students. The validity in general shows the test items are not valid, but the validity in each test item shows 17 of 20 questions are valid. Reliability in person is lower than reliability in items. Even though, the test items still have good quality from the reliability findings. The novelty of this study is the validity and reliability of the PISA 2015 test items in Indonesian students as the sample. PISA 2015 used scientific literacy as the dominant test at that time. This study has benefitted other researchers by showing the importance of the validity and reliability of the instruments and ensuring the quality of the instruments for other researchers who will conduct future research using good validity and reliable instruments.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-08-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jere/article/view/7387</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): August 2024; 169-179</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jere/article/view/7387/1940</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>