Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Ontology-based Why-Question Analysis Using Lexico-Syntactic Patterns

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 5 No. 2 (2015)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v5i2.pp318-332
ISSN
2088-8708, 2088-8708
Published
2015-04-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

This research focuses on developing a method to analyze why-questions. Some previous researches on the why-question analysis usually used the morphological and the syntactical approach without considering the expected answer types. Moreover, they rarely involved domain ontology to capture the semantic or conceptualization of the content. Consequently, some semantic mismatches occurred and then resulting not appropriate answers. The proposed method considers the expected answer types and involves domain ontology. It adapts the simple, the bag-of-words like model, by using semantic entities (i.e., concepts/entities and relations) instead of words to represent a query. The proposed method expands the question by adding the additional semantic entities got by executing the constructed SPARQL query of the why-question over the domain ontology. The major contribution of this research is in developing an ontology-based why-question analysis method by considering the expected answer types. Some experiments have been conducted to evaluate each phase of the proposed method. The results show good performance for all performance measures used (i.e., precision, recall, undergeneration, and overgeneration). Furthermore, comparison against two baseline methods, the keyword-based ones (i.e., the term-based and the phrase-based method), shows that the proposed method obtained better performance results in terms of MRR and P@10 values.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 52 co-authorship links · 18 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Udayana University
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Universitas Stikubank
  • University of Indonesia
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Retantyo WardoyoUniversitas Gadjah Mada7
Khabib MustofaUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Edhy SutantaUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Edy WinarnoUniversitas Stikubank4
Aniati Murni ArymurthyUniversity of Indonesia4
Sri T. HartatiUniversitas Gadjah Mada3
Sandi Fajar RodiyansyahIndonesia University of Education2
Kridalaksana Harsa AwangAffiliation unknown1
Mardi Siswo UtomoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Zaenal AbidinState University of Semarang1
Yustina RetnoAffiliation unknown1
Badrus ZamanUniversitas Airlangga1
Abriyono AbriyonoAffiliation unknown1
I Gede Aris GunadiUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
Rocky Yefrenes DillakUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Ikhwan RusliantoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Rahmi HidayatiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Salman AliajiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Agustinus JacobusUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Sulistyowati SulistyowatiAffiliation unknown1
Refta ListiaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Mahmuddin YunusAffiliation unknown1
Noviah Dwi PutrantiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Ambarwati AmbarwatiInstituto Profissional de Canossa - IPDC1
Agus Sasmito AriwibowoAffiliation unknown1
Hermawan SyahputraState University of Medan1
Eka KaryawatiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Sri SuwarnoDuta Wacana Christian University1
Robynson AmsekeAffiliation unknown1
Rajif Agung YunmarSumatera Institute of Technology1
Nurmiyati TamatjitaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
La Ode Hasnuddin S. SagalaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Nicodemus Mardanus SetiohardjoPoliteknik Negeri Kupang1
Natalis RansiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Sumarni AdiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Ngurah Agus Sanjaya ERUdayana University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Ontology-based Why-Question Analysis Using Lexico-Syntactic Patterns</dc:title><dc:creator>Karyawati, A.A.I.N. Eka</dc:creator><dc:creator>Winarko, Edi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Azhari, Azhari</dc:creator><dc:creator>Harjoko, Agus</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This research focuses on developing a method to analyze why-questions.  Some previous researches on the why-question analysis usually used the morphological and the syntactical approach without considering the expected answer types. Moreover, they rarely involved domain ontology to capture the semantic or conceptualization of the content. Consequently, some semantic mismatches occurred and then resulting not appropriate answers. The proposed method considers the expected answer types and involves domain ontology. It adapts the simple, the bag-of-words like model, by using semantic entities (i.e., concepts/entities and relations) instead of words to represent a query. The proposed method expands the question by adding the additional semantic entities got by executing the constructed SPARQL query of the why-question over the domain ontology. The major contribution of this research is in developing an ontology-based why-question analysis method by considering the expected answer types. Some experiments have been conducted to evaluate each phase of the proposed method. The results show good performance for all performance measures used (i.e., precision, recall, undergeneration, and overgeneration). Furthermore, comparison against two baseline methods, the keyword-based ones (i.e., the term-based and the phrase-based method), shows that the proposed method obtained better performance results in terms of MRR and P@10 values.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2015-04-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v5i2.pp318-332</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v5i2.pp318-332</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 5 No 2 (2015); 318</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/5700/4761</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>