Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Comparative study of user experience on mobile pedestrian navigation between digital map interface and location-based augmented reality

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v10i2.pp2037-2044
ISSN
2088-8708, 2088-8708
Published
2020-04-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

Fast-paced mobile technology development has permitted augmented reality experiences to be delivered on mobile pedestrian navigation context. The fact that the more prevalent of this technology commonly will substituting the digital map visualization to present the geo-location information is still debatable. This paper comprises a report on a field study comparing about user experience when interacting with different modes of mobile electronic assistance in the context of pedestrian navigation interfaces which utilize location-based augmented reality (AR) and two-dimensional digital map to visualize the points of interest (POIs) location in the vicinity of the user. The study was conducted with two subsequent experiments in the Zhongli District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan. The study involved 10 participants aged between 22 and 28 years with different experiences in using smartphones and navigation systems. Navigation performance was measured based on a usability approach on pragmatic quality and hedonic quality like effectiveness (success rate of task completion), efficiency (task completion time) and satisfaction in real outdoor conditions. The evaluation findings have been cross-checked with the user’s personal comments. We aim at eliciting knowledge about user requirements related to mobile pedestrian interfaces and evaluating user experience from pragmatic and hedonic viewpoints. Results show that in the context of pedestrian navigation, digital map interfaces lead to significantly better navigation performance in pragmatic attributes in comparison to AR interfaces. Nevertheless, the study also reveals that location-based AR is more valued by participants in hedonic qualities and overall performance.

Collaboration network of the authors

19 authors · 37 co-authorship links · 7 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Brawijaya
  • National Central University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Adam Hendra BrataUniversity of Brawijaya7
Sholeh Hadi PramonoUniversity of Brawijaya4
Lutfi FananiUniversity of Brawijaya2
Ginanjar Wisnu Ifan A.University of Brawijaya1
Noveria Anggraeni FiajiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Prima ZulvarinaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ahmad Afif SupiantoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Santi Yunika SufianaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Reinhard Jonathan SilalahiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Thareq Abel RamadhanAffiliation unknown1
Thareq Abel RamadhanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mahardeka Tri AnanataAffiliation unknown1
Ika Kusumaning PutriUniversity of Brawijaya1
Rahmadwati RahmadwatiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Achmad BasukiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mukhammad Sharif HidayatullohUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mohamad Handy NugrahaUniversity of Brawijaya1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Comparative study of user experience on mobile pedestrian navigation between digital map interface and location-based augmented reality</dc:title><dc:creator>Brata, Komang Candra</dc:creator><dc:creator>Liang, Deron</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Fast-paced mobile technology development has permitted augmented reality experiences to be delivered on mobile pedestrian navigation context. The fact that the more prevalent of this technology commonly will substituting the digital map visualization to present the geo-location information is still debatable. This paper comprises a report on a field study comparing about user experience when interacting with different modes of mobile electronic assistance in the context of pedestrian navigation interfaces which utilize location-based augmented reality (AR) and two-dimensional digital map to visualize the points of interest (POIs) location in the vicinity of the user. The study was conducted with two subsequent experiments in the Zhongli District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan. The study involved 10 participants aged between 22 and 28 years with different experiences in using smartphones and navigation systems. Navigation performance was measured based on a usability approach on pragmatic quality and hedonic quality like effectiveness (success rate of task completion), efficiency (task completion time) and satisfaction in real outdoor conditions. The evaluation findings have been cross-checked with the user’s personal comments. We aim at eliciting knowledge about user requirements related to mobile pedestrian interfaces and evaluating user experience from pragmatic and hedonic viewpoints. Results show that in the context of pedestrian navigation, digital map interfaces lead to significantly better navigation performance in pragmatic attributes in comparison to AR interfaces. Nevertheless, the study also reveals that location-based AR is more valued by participants in hedonic qualities and overall performance.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2020-04-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i2.pp2037-2044</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v10i2.pp2037-2044</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 10 No 2 (2020); 2037</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/20838/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>