Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Sejarah Pengeboman Candi Borobudur Tahun 1985: Tinjauan Sejarah Sosial Politik di Indonesia

Journal of Indonesian History · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019) · hlm. 121–134

DOI
10.15294/jih.v8i2.37051
ISSN
2549-0370, 2252-6633
Terbit
2019-12-25
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The history of politics in Indonesia, especially Orde Baru is indeed inseparable from the conflict between Islam and the state, especially the problem of ideology. This was seen when the Orde Baru applied a non-aspirational political strategy to Islam, one of them is asas tunggal Pancasila. The inequality of political views with the government caused various reactions and resistance from radical Islamists. One of the incidents is the Borobudur Temple bombing in 1985. The methods used in this study were historical research methods, this is: (1) Heuristics, (2) Source Criticism, (3) Interpretation, and (4) Historiography. The results of this study indicate that there are factors underlying the occurrence of the Borobudur Temple bombing, this is: (1) Political factors, the reactions of various Orde Baru policies which were considered to marginalize Islam, (2) Social factors, the emergence of a sense of injustice conducted by the government in the Tanjung Priok tragedy 1984, (3) Religious and ideological emotional factors, the desire to carry out a revolution like in Iran by revenge for bombing. The handling of the government in this case took two months, until the incident of Pemudi Express Bus exploded which resulted in the arrest of the perpetrators. This bombing resulted in the destruction of nine Borobudur Temple stupas which led to the restoration and improvement of the temple area security system. This incident also had an impact on the tourism, social and political economy in Indonesia. Keywords: Bombing, Borobudur Temple, Social History

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 83 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Hamdan Tri AtmajaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Bain BainAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Cahyo Budi UtomoState University of Semarang3
Abdul MuntholibAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Arif PurnomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muchamad SultonAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Astri YullianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Farida YusrinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amin NurohimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ba'in Ba'inAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andi AmirudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ardhian RamadhanyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ayun HaifaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdurahman KhubaibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Claudea Cici NindhikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad BurhanudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aniza Oktarina WulandariState University of Semarang1
Ainun MunawarState University of Semarang1
Ahmad RifaiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suwito Eko PramonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dzurotul QorinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitrianis NovitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kahfi Ananda GiatamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
R. SuharsoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dika Restu AyuningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jayusman JayusmanState University of Semarang1
Ribut Tulus RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kurnia DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yahya Ariyanto PutroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wasino WasinoState University of Semarang1
Akhmad SayutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hutri LimahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syaiful AminAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mazdar FaizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Roby IndracahyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aulia Nur Wihdlatil AiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anis Nurul Chabibah AnisAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jih/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Sejarah Pengeboman Candi Borobudur Tahun 1985: Tinjauan Sejarah Sosial Politik di Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Pratama, Angga Novian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sodiq, Ibnu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suryadi, Andy</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The history of politics in Indonesia, especially Orde Baru is indeed inseparable from the conflict between Islam and the state, especially the problem of ideology. This was seen when the Orde Baru applied a non-aspirational political strategy to Islam, one of them is asas tunggal Pancasila. The inequality of political views with the government caused various reactions and resistance from radical Islamists. One of the incidents is the Borobudur Temple bombing in 1985. The methods used in this study were historical research methods, this is: (1) Heuristics, (2) Source Criticism, (3) Interpretation, and (4) Historiography. The results of this study indicate that there are factors underlying the occurrence of the Borobudur Temple bombing, this is: (1) Political factors, the reactions of various Orde Baru policies which were considered to marginalize Islam, (2) Social factors, the emergence of a sense of injustice conducted by the government in the Tanjung Priok tragedy 1984, (3) Religious and ideological emotional factors, the desire to carry out a revolution like in Iran by revenge for bombing. The handling of the government in this case took two months, until the incident of Pemudi Express Bus exploded which resulted in the arrest of the perpetrators. This bombing resulted in the destruction of nine Borobudur Temple stupas which led to the restoration and improvement of the temple area security system. This incident also had an impact on the tourism, social and political economy in Indonesia.
&amp;nbsp;
Keywords:&amp;nbsp;Bombing, Borobudur Temple, Social History</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-12-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jih/article/view/37051</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jih.v8i2.37051</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Indonesian History; Vol 8 No 2 (2019): Journal of Indonesian History; 121-134</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-0370</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6633</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jih.v8i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jih/article/view/37051/15245</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Indonesian History</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>