Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Sole Custody and The Implication of Fault-based Divorce Under the Indonesian Legal System

Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024) · hlm. 249–278

DOI
10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4576
ISSN
2548-1592, 2548-1584
Terbit
2024-05-08
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study analyses the reasons why most judges in Indonesia’s religious courts tend to rule in favour of the sole custody model over the joint custody model following a divorce, even though the state, through the Child Protection Act, has enacted regulations emphasizing the granting of child custody using the joint custody model. This study is an evaluative review of the dominant sole custody model decided in the Religious Court concerning the Indonesian divorce law system, which emphasizes that divorce must be filed for a reason. The study results show that the divorce law requiring divorce to be accompanied by a reason and adopted by the Religious Court makes Indonesia a country that adopts a fault-based divorce system. This impacts the contestation and efforts of one party to find fault with the other party through the proof process in the Religious Court. Furthermore, to show that one party is better and more moral, there is a struggle for child custody rights while affirming the presumption that the party winning child custody is the better and more moral party. This means that child custody is always given to one party, not to both parties. The Religious Court needs to consider the use of a no-fault divorce system for several reasons: (1) Islamic jurisprudence recognizes no-fault divorce, namely, divorce with khuluk (khul’), and (2) efforts not to defame the couple in court are more in line with Islamic teachings.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

31 penulis · 80 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 37 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Diponegoro University
  • Leiden University
  • Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yuli Prasetyo AdhiDiponegoro University5
Dewi SulistianingsihState University of Semarang4
Martitah MartitahState University of Semarang3
Adnan HakimUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Sandi SandiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Rachmad Rialdi HasanUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Kun Retno HandayaniState University of Semarang1
Indah Sri UtariState University of Semarang1
Nabila Putri SyakilaState University of Semarang1
Nofika IlmiyahState University of Semarang1
Diaj Puji LestariState University of Semarang1
Arif HidayatState University of Semarang1
Tegar Islami PutraState University of Semarang1
Moh. Imam GusthomiState University of Semarang1
Niken SeptianiState University of Semarang1
Christian Chandra WijayaState University of Semarang1
Dita Elvia Kusuma PutriUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Faiz RahmanLeiden University1
Ahmad Bunyan WahibSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
Yulkarnain HarahabUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Ravilka Yustitia IsmailUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Sri Wiyati MahraniUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Juharsah JuharsahUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Nuryamin BudiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Farhan Ramadhani IstianandarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
MR SumikroUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Destri Budi NugraheniUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Tata WijayantaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Sole Custody and The Implication of Fault-based Divorce Under the Indonesian Legal System</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hartini, Hartini</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ilhami, Haniah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yusoff, Rahmawati Mohd</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Fault-based Divorce System</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Impplication</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Joint Custody</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Religious Court</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sole Custody</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study analyses the reasons why most judges in Indonesia’s religious courts tend to rule in favour of the sole custody model over the joint custody model following a divorce, even though the state, through the Child Protection Act, has enacted regulations emphasizing the granting of child custody using the joint custody model. This study is an evaluative review of the dominant sole custody model decided in the Religious Court concerning the Indonesian divorce law system, which emphasizes that divorce must be filed for a reason. The study results show that the divorce law requiring divorce to be accompanied by a reason and adopted by the Religious Court makes Indonesia a country that adopts a fault-based divorce system. This impacts the contestation and efforts of one party to find fault with the other party through the proof process in the Religious Court. Furthermore, to show that one party is better and more moral, there is a struggle for child custody rights while affirming the presumption that the party winning child custody is the better and more moral party. This means that child custody is always given to one party, not to both parties. The Religious Court needs to consider the use of a no-fault divorce system for several reasons: (1) Islamic jurisprudence recognizes no-fault divorce, namely, divorce with khuluk (khul’), and (2) efforts not to defame the couple in court are more in line with Islamic teachings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-05-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/article/view/4576</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4576</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Navigating Legal Landscapes: Exploring Justice Development in Indonesia and the Global Context; 249-278</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1592</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1584</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jils.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/article/view/4576/534</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4576</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>