Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Resolving the Judiciary Tensions between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Indonesia

Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024) · hlm. 317–352

DOI
10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4635
ISSN
2548-1592, 2548-1584
Terbit
2024-05-09
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This paper addresses a critical issue undermining the legal coherence and judicial stability in Indonesia: the discord between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court in the realm of judicial review. This paper uncovers the root cause as a weak chain of validity in law formation, aggravated by divergent legal frameworks governing each court through utilizing doctrinal research methods. Drawing on Bullygin's deontic logic theory, the paper reveals a lack of explicit cross-sectoral policy synchronization. To immediately alleviate these tensions, this paper proposes the establishment of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the two courts, aiming to solidify the chain of legal norms and restore systemic stability. For a long-term resolution, a comprehensive revision of the judiciary law is advocated. This research serves as an urgent call for coordinated reforms to bolster the integrity and efficiency of Indonesia's judicial system.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

32 penulis · 67 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 18 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • University Center of Brasília
  • Pázmány Péter Catholic University
  • Al-Ahgaff University
  • Universidade de Díli
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Deviana Az Zahra RakasiwiSebelas Maret University2
Miftah Nur KhayantoSebelas Maret University2
Yapiter MarpiSebelas Maret University2
Pujiyono SuwadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Rosyid RidloSebelas Maret University1
Muhammad Rosyid RidhloAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lego KarjokoSebelas Maret University1
Shubhan Noor HidayatSebelas Maret University1
Sri WahyuniSebelas Maret University1
Arum Nur RahmawatiSebelas Maret University1
Cheryl Permata Kumala DewiSebelas Maret University1
Widya Chrisna ManikaSebelas Maret University1
Pujiyono SuwadiSebelas Maret University1
Hazeem Moutawally ElsyafeiAl-Ahgaff University1
Asianto NugrohoSebelas Maret University1
Abdul Kadir JaelaniSebelas Maret University1
Ristania Intan PermatasariSebelas Maret University1
Adi SulistiyonoSebelas Maret University1
Seguito MonteiroUniversidade de Díli1
Alya Maya Khonsa RahayuSebelas Maret University1
Indra RahmatullahHasanuddin University1
Anis MashdurohatunSultan Agung Islamic University1
Hartiwiningsih HartiwiningsihSebelas Maret University1
Andri Winjaya LaksanaSultan Agung Islamic University1
Achmad .Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maria MadalinaSebelas Maret University1
Adriana Grahani FirdausySebelas Maret University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Resolving the Judiciary Tensions between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Purwadi, Hari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hermawan, Sapto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Soares, Ardyllis Alves</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Németh-Szebeni, Zsófia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kusuma, Febrian Indar Surya</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Constitutional Court</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Deontic Logic</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Judiciary Tension</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Supreme Court</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This paper addresses a critical issue undermining the legal coherence and judicial stability in Indonesia: the discord between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court in the realm of judicial review. This paper uncovers the root cause as a weak chain of validity in law formation, aggravated by divergent legal frameworks governing each court through utilizing doctrinal research methods. Drawing on Bullygin's deontic logic theory, the paper reveals a lack of explicit cross-sectoral policy synchronization. To immediately alleviate these tensions, this paper proposes the establishment of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the two courts, aiming to solidify the chain of legal norms and restore systemic stability. For a long-term resolution, a comprehensive revision of the judiciary law is advocated. This research serves as an urgent call for coordinated reforms to bolster the integrity and efficiency of Indonesia's judicial system.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-05-09</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/article/view/4635</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4635</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Navigating Legal Landscapes: Exploring Justice Development in Indonesia and the Global Context; 317-352</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1592</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1584</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jils.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/article/view/4635/548</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4635</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>