Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Role of Religious Courts in Settling Sharia Economic Disputes in Indonesia: Genealogy Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012

Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 391–430

DOI
10.15294/jils.v10i1.12564
ISSN
2548-1592, 2548-1584
Terbit
2025-08-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

For more than five decades (Since the implementation of Law Number 3 of 2006, which expanded the jurisdiction of religious courts to resolve Sharia economic disputes, there have been various debates regarding the effectiveness and implementation of this policy. Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 clarified the legal position of religious courts, affirming their exclusive authority to adjudicate Sharia economic disputes. Therefore, this research provides an examination of the evolution of Religious Courts and their authority in resolving Sharia economic disputes following Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012, and the implications of implementing this decision. This study is normative research using historical, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The findings of this study indicate that the constitutional evolution of Religious Courts in resolving Sharia economic disputes in Indonesia has made significant progress. Their jurisdiction has been expanded by laws such as Number 3 of 2006 and Number 50 of 2009, which grant authority in Sharia economics and Sharia banking disputes. Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 eliminated the legal dualism of the controversial provisions in Law Number 21 of 2008, ensuring legal clarity and consistency in upholding justice in Sharia economic cases. Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012, Religious Courts in Indonesia possess absolute authority in resolving Sharia economic disputes. The resolution of Sharia economic disputes by Religious Courts is expected to provide justice and welfare for the parties involved in the disputes.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

27 penulis · 73 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 34 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Islam Negeri Madura
  • Universitas Jember
  • Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Az-Zain Sampang
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • National University of Malaysia
  • Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
  • Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Erie HariyantoUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura7
Rahmadi Indra TektonaUniversitas Jember2
A’an EfendiUniversitas Jember2
Moh ZahidUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura2
Rudy HaryantoUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura2
Masrufah MasrufahUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura2
Dea Helmi SeptiantoUniversitas Jember1
Abd HannanUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Arif WahyudiUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Bhismoadi Tri Wahyu FaizalUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Hosen HosenUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Moh. HamzahUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Saifuddin Zuhri QudsySunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
Ahmad Sunawari LongNational University of Malaysia1
Umi SupraptiningsihUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Novita CahyaniUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Sudarsono SudarsonoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Lulik Tri CahyaningrumMahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia1
Nurhidayatuloh NurhidayatulohMaastricht University1
Moh. Hafid EffendyUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Moch. Cholid WardiUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Maimun NawawiUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Ahmad SuhaimiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Role of Religious Courts in Settling Sharia Economic Disputes in Indonesia: Genealogy Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Susylawati, Eka</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hamzah, Moh.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Madani, Nadea Nur Shofia</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Constitutional Court Decision</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Absolute Authority</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Religious Courts</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Resolution of Sharia Economic Disputes</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">For more than five decades (Since the implementation of Law Number 3 of 2006, which expanded the jurisdiction of religious courts to resolve Sharia economic disputes, there have been various debates regarding the effectiveness and implementation of this policy. Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 clarified the legal position of religious courts, affirming their exclusive authority to adjudicate Sharia economic disputes. Therefore, this research provides an examination of the evolution of Religious Courts and their authority in resolving Sharia economic disputes following Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012, and the implications of implementing this decision. This study is normative research using historical, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The findings of this study indicate that the constitutional evolution of Religious Courts in resolving Sharia economic disputes in Indonesia has made significant progress. Their jurisdiction has been expanded by laws such as Number 3 of 2006 and Number 50 of 2009, which grant authority in Sharia economics and Sharia banking disputes. Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 eliminated the legal dualism of the controversial provisions in Law Number 21 of 2008, ensuring legal clarity and consistency in upholding justice in Sharia economic cases. Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012, Religious Courts in Indonesia possess absolute authority in resolving Sharia economic disputes. The resolution of Sharia economic disputes by Religious Courts is expected to provide justice and welfare for the parties involved in the disputes.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-08-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/article/view/12564</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jils.v10i1.12564</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Legal Transformation and Policy Challenges in Indonesia: Navigating Technology, Democracy, and Social Change; 391-430</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1592</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1584</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jils.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/article/view/12564/6201</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Eka Susylawati, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, Moh. Hamzah, Nadea Nur shofia Madani (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>