Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

From Monopoly to Machine-opoly: Rethinking Market Regulations for Autonomous AI Agents

Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies · Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 33–80

DOI
10.15294/jils.v11i1.38477
ISSN
2548-1592, 2548-1584
Terbit
2026-06-13
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The paper examines the effectiveness and relevance of business competition law in regulating market dynamics in the AI era, and formulates an adaptive regulatory framework that aligns technological developments with the principles of justice and accountability. The method used is a normative-legal-research method with a qualitative approach. The paper's findings are that in the digital era driven by AI, the paradigm of business competition is undergoing a fundamental transformation that demands a profound reflection on existing legal principles. The phenomenon of machine-opoly, monopolies generated by autonomous AI agents, challenges traditional concepts of fair competition. This issue underscores the tension between technological innovation as a force for value creation and the need for fairness and balance in the market. From a theoretical perspective, AI presents non-human actors running complex algorithms, which opens up space for collusion and market domination practices that are difficult to detect and control by conventional regulation. The emergence of machine-opoly transformed traditional monopolies into dominance based on algorithms, data, and autonomous artificial intelligence. Through the TFEU and AI Act, the EU has integrated transparency and accountability into competition law, followed by the US, the UK, Australia, and China with similar adaptive measures. Indonesia, through Law No. 5 of 1999, still faces limitations in regulating algorithmic behavior. Therefore, regulatory reforms that emphasize algorithmic transparency and supervisory capacity are essential to maintain the fairness and innovation of digital markets.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

24 penulis · 56 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 34 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Trisakti
  • Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia
  • University of Canterbury
  • Anahuac Mayab University
  • Université Laval
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Monash University Malaysia
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Maria Silvya E. WanggaUniversitas Trisakti3
Verandha MayvaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Arif WicaksanaUniversitas Trisakti3
Sharda AbriantiUniversitas Trisakti3
Sharda AbriantiUniversitas Trisakti2
Séréna Ortigosa FernandezUniversité Laval2
Sharda AbriantUniversitas Trisakti2
Rais Akbar RahmaUniversitas Trisakti2
Berto Mulia WibawaMonash University Malaysia2
Jimi Rambo ArranchadoeAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Januardo Sulung Partogi SihombingUniversitas Trisakti1
Intan Nevia CahyanaUniversitas Trisakti1
Narita AdityaningrumUniversitas Trisakti1
Dian Adriawan Dg TawangUniversitas Trisakti1
Andrés Herrera EsquivelAnahuac Mayab University1
Amalia ZuhraUniversitas Trisakti1
Elsi Kartika SariUniversitas Trisakti1
Ninuk WijiningsihUniversitas Trisakti1
Setiyono SetiyonoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Dinda KeumalaUniversitas Trisakti1
Nadia NursantihUniversitas Trisakti1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">From Monopoly to Machine-opoly: Rethinking Market Regulations for Autonomous AI Agents</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sabirin, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Arranchado, Jimi Rambo</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">AI, Market, Monopoly, and Machine-opoly</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The paper examines the effectiveness and relevance of business competition law in regulating market dynamics in the AI era, and formulates an adaptive regulatory framework that aligns technological developments with the principles of justice and accountability. The method used is a normative-legal-research method with a qualitative approach. The paper's findings are that in the digital era driven by AI, the paradigm of business competition is undergoing a fundamental transformation that demands a profound reflection on existing legal principles. The phenomenon of machine-opoly, monopolies generated by autonomous AI agents, challenges traditional concepts of fair competition. This issue underscores the tension between technological innovation as a force for value creation and the need for fairness and balance in the market. From a theoretical perspective, AI presents non-human actors running complex algorithms, which opens up space for collusion and market domination practices that are difficult to detect and control by conventional regulation. The emergence of machine-opoly transformed traditional monopolies into dominance based on algorithms, data, and autonomous artificial intelligence. Through the TFEU and AI Act, the EU has integrated transparency and accountability into competition law, followed by the US, the UK, Australia, and China with similar adaptive measures. Indonesia, through Law No. 5 of 1999, still faces limitations in regulating algorithmic behavior. Therefore, regulatory reforms that emphasize algorithmic transparency and supervisory capacity are essential to maintain the fairness and innovation of digital markets.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-13</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/article/view/38477</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jils.v11i1.38477</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Contemporary Legal Responses to Technological, Economic, and Social Change; 33-80</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1592</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1584</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jils.v11i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jils/article/view/38477/10174</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Anna Maria Tri Anggraini, Ahmad Sabirin, Jimi Rambo Arranchado (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>