Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Corrective Justice and Its Significance on the Private Law

Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022) · hlm. 1–30

DOI
10.15294/jils.v7i1.46691
ISSN
2548-1592, 2548-1584
Terbit
2022-06-09
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This article attempts to explore corrective justice and its significant role in private law. There are many justice perspective on private law, but corrective justice is part of the view that have significant role in the work of private law. Breaking the private property right charges someone to take responsibility. To what extent private law rules responsibility of the someone. Corrective justice can be meassurement to take responsibility. Corrective justice can be traced back to Aristotle's ideas of justice and Kant's ideas of rights. Hans Kelsen sharply criticized the concept of corrective justice for only proposing formal ideas without touching anything substantial. Apart from this criticism, corrective justice remains very important in private law studies because it provides solutions between two private actors in which one benefits from the losses experienced by the other. So far, the dispute settlement mechanism in private law gives the winning party a full share, while the loser does not receive any share at all. Corrective justice offers a quantitative measure that balances what the defendant is deducting and what is added to the claimant's loss. The application of this principle encourages the creation of equal punishment between the disputed parties.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

2 penulis · 1 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jils/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Corrective Justice and Its Significance on the Private Law</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hage, Markus Y</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ningrum, Panggih Kusuma</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This article attempts to explore corrective justice and its significant role in private law. There are many justice perspective on private law, but corrective justice is part of the view that have significant role in the work of private law. Breaking the private property right charges someone to take responsibility. To what extent private law rules responsibility of the someone. Corrective justice can be meassurement to take responsibility. Corrective justice can be traced back to Aristotle's ideas of justice and Kant's ideas of rights. Hans Kelsen sharply criticized the concept of corrective justice for only proposing formal ideas without touching anything substantial. Apart from this criticism, corrective justice remains very important in private law studies because it provides solutions between two private actors in which one benefits from the losses experienced by the other. So far, the dispute settlement mechanism in private law gives the winning party a full share, while the loser does not receive any share at all. Corrective justice offers a quantitative measure that balances what the defendant is deducting and what is added to the claimant's loss. The application of this principle encourages the creation of equal punishment between the disputed parties.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-06-09</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jils/article/view/46691</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jils.v7i1.46691</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies; Vol 7 No 1 (2022): A Discourse of Justice and Legal Protection in Domestic and Global Perspective; 1-30</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1592</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1584</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jils.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jils/article/view/46691/21746</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Y Hage, Panggih Kusuma Ningrum</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>