Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Reform Regulation of Novum in Criminal Judges in an Effort to Provide Legal Certainty

Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 437–482

DOI
10.15294/jils.v6i2.51371
ISSN
2548-1592, 2548-1584
Terbit
2021-11-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The research stems from Decision Number 224 PK/PID.SUS/2018 which grants the application for judicial review (hereinafter abbreviated as PK) by a suspected narcotics abuser with a novum (new evidence) in the form of previous judges' decisions. In this case, this study aims to conceptualize how the regulation of PK legal remedies in criminal cases should be. This research is a normative legal research, the approach used is a case approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach, with a literature study research technique. After knowing the arguments for the admissibility of submitting a PK in the form of a District Court Decision, the author makes several comparisons with the Criminal Procedure Code (America and France), and concludes based on this comparison that the use of the basis for submitting a PK should be regulated clearly and firmly in the Criminal Procedure Code, because the two countries in its criminal procedural law it expressly states that the submission of a PK must be based on new facts and evidence which, if presented at the previous trial, has the potential to reduce or even abort the prosecution's charge

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

20 penulis · 39 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 4 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Diponegoro University
  • Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Kukuh TejomurtiSebelas Maret University3
Umi Khaerah PatiSebelas Maret University3
Pranoto PranotoSebelas Maret University2
M ZaidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Kurniawan Budi WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Willy Naresta HanumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Devi TriasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moch Syafrudin Dwisapto LaxamanahadyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jamal WiwohoSebelas Maret University1
Drifarrosa Aisy Aufanuha MachfudzSebelas Maret University1
Pranoto PranotoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moch Najib ImanullahSebelas Maret University1
Ryan Ganang KurniaSebelas Maret University1
Nabitatus Sa’adahDiponegoro University1
Ahmad MuchlisDiponegoro University1
Syarief TohaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jils/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Reform Regulation of Novum in Criminal Judges in an Effort to Provide Legal Certainty</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Saputra, Rian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ardi, Muhammad Khalif</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pujiyono, Pujiyono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Firdaus, Sunny Ummul</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The research stems from Decision Number 224 PK/PID.SUS/2018 which grants the application for judicial review (hereinafter abbreviated as PK) by a suspected narcotics abuser with a novum (new evidence) in the form of previous judges' decisions. In this case, this study aims to conceptualize how the regulation of PK legal remedies in criminal cases should be. This research is a normative legal research, the approach used is a case approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach, with a literature study research technique. After knowing the arguments for the admissibility of submitting a PK in the form of a District Court Decision, the author makes several comparisons with the Criminal Procedure Code (America and France), and concludes based on this comparison that the use of the basis for submitting a PK should be regulated clearly and firmly in the Criminal Procedure Code, because the two countries in its criminal procedural law it expressly states that the submission of a PK must be based on new facts and evidence which, if presented at the previous trial, has the potential to reduce or even abort the prosecution's charge</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jils/article/view/51371</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jils.v6i2.51371</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies; Vol 6 No 2 (2021): Indonesian Legal Thoughts Amid Various World Legal Thoughts; 437-482</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1592</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1584</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jils.v6i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jils/article/view/51371/20851</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Rian Saputra, Muhammad Khalif Ardi, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Sunny Ummul Firdaus</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>