Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Rethinking curriculum planning through backward design: a qualitative study of understanding by design in an inclusive school context

Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies · Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 1–21

DOI
10.15294/ijcets.v16i1.30475
ISSN
2252-6447, 2527-4597
Terbit
2026-09-18
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study examines the implementation of Understanding by Design (UbD) within an inclusive school context in Indonesia, focusing on tensions between centralized curriculum standards and localized pedagogical values. The research examines how inclusive schools negotiate backward-design principles amid dual accountability demands. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through autoethnography, semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and curriculum document analysis across two hubs of a progressive inclusive school network in different regional contexts. Findings reveal three interconnected tensions across UbD stages: (1) goal-setting challenges arising from navigating national curriculum standards alongside the school’s internal values framework (Citta); (2) an assessment implementation gap in which higher-order cognitive objectives documented in curriculum plans were consistently enacted at lower cognitive levels due to structural constraints; and (3) learning plan localization challenges reflected in the uneven implementation of the school’s 5M pedagogical framework. These tensions collectively illustrate what this study conceptualizes as implementation pragmatism. The study contributes theoretically by extending UbD scholarship into inclusive education contexts within the Global South, highlighting the limits of backward design under conditions of heterogeneity and regulatory pressure. Practically, the findings inform organizational and pedagogical practices, as well as school leaders, about the need for systemic alignment among inclusive curriculum aspirations, assessment structures, and classroom realities.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

28 penulis · 72 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Wardi WardiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Achmad FarchanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bagus Winarko NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Viona SantikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ayuk RonndiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Disrun Aji PrabowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ismi ZakiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyu SusantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Marsaa Alyaa Aufaa AdindaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Restu Adhi PamungkasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gracia Eveline CandraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Liana Anggi Dwi NingtiasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Silmika FaririnAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nadia SalsabilaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yahya Nur IfrizaState University of Semarang1
Decky AvriliandaState University of Semarang1
Muarifuddin MuarifuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dhela Septian AnggarettaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sugeng PurwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Basuki SulistioAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Heri Tri Luqman B. S.Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suripto SuriptoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nanang OktaviantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Christian Arief JayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rafika Bayu KusumandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Istyarini IstyariniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jktp/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Rethinking curriculum planning through backward design: a qualitative study of understanding by design in an inclusive school context</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kurniawan, Alisa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wahzudik, Niam</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Understanding by Design (UbD)</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Inclusive Education</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Curriculum Implementation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Assessment  Implementation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Indonesian Education</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study examines the implementation of Understanding by Design (UbD) within an inclusive school context in Indonesia, focusing on tensions between centralized curriculum standards and localized pedagogical values. The research examines how inclusive schools negotiate backward-design principles amid dual accountability demands. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through autoethnography, semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and curriculum document analysis across two hubs of a progressive inclusive school network in different regional contexts. Findings reveal three interconnected tensions across UbD stages: (1) goal-setting challenges arising from navigating national curriculum standards alongside the school’s internal values framework (Citta); (2) an assessment implementation gap in which higher-order cognitive objectives documented in curriculum plans were consistently enacted at lower cognitive levels due to structural constraints; and (3) learning plan localization challenges reflected in the uneven implementation of the school’s 5M pedagogical framework. These tensions collectively illustrate what this study conceptualizes as implementation pragmatism. The study contributes theoretically by extending UbD scholarship into inclusive education contexts within the Global South, highlighting the limits of backward design under conditions of heterogeneity and regulatory pressure. Practically, the findings inform organizational and pedagogical practices, as well as school leaders, about the need for systemic alignment among inclusive curriculum aspirations, assessment structures, and classroom realities.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-09-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jktp/article/view/30475</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ijcets.v16i1.30475</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): May 2026; 1-21</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6447</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2527-4597</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ijcets.v16i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jktp/article/view/30475/11456</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>