Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Constitutional Transition in a Democratic State: A Critical View of the Omnibus Law Establishing Employment Copyright Law

Journal of Law and Legal Reform · Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024) · hlm. 1913–1940

DOI
10.15294/jllr.v5i4.1552
ISSN
2715-0968, 2715-0941
Terbit
2024-12-15
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The debate regarding Omnibus Law as the main means for structuring legal regulations in Indonesia attracted a lot of public attention when the Omnibus Law method, which was previously little known in Indonesia as a country that adheres to the Continental European legal system, was used in the preparation of draft laws (RUU). How does the constitutional transition to the establishment of an omnibus law on copyright work in a democratic country? How do we review the constitutionality of the implementation of the Omnibus Law and the copyright mechanism in the formation of statutory regulations? This research uses the concept of normative descriptive research, or what can be called normative juridical research. With this method, law is interpreted as what is written in legislation (law in a book), or law is interpreted as a legal rule, which is a standard for appropriate behavior. The Omnibus Law method practiced in the common law system is interpreted as a (new) law that regulates various kinds of regulations to simplify the various laws that are still in force. Constitutionally, the legal position of the omnibus law concept has not been regulated in the legal system or in the laws and regulations in Indonesia. Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, which was formed using the Omnibus method, is considered to be constitutionally contradictory because it does not have clear objectives and formulation, both in terms of the standard of formation, the systematics of its creation, and the process of changing its substance.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

19 penulis · 49 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 30 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Walisongo State Islamic University
  • Padjadjaran University
  • Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado
  • University of Malaya
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muhammad IshomUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten3
Dedi SunardiUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten2
Asep PudoliUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten2
Sam'ani Sam'aniUniversitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan1
Rokhmadi RokhmadiWalisongo State Islamic University1
Nasihun AminWalisongo State Islamic University1
Suprijati SaribInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Manado1
Endad MusaddadUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten1
Mohd Norhusairi Mat HussinUniversity of Malaya1
Arif Nur RahmanSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Ida MursidahUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten1
Sholahuddin Al AyubiHasanuddin University1
Entol Zaenal MuttaqinHasanuddin University1
Nita AnggraeniHasanuddin University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Constitutional Transition in a Democratic State: A Critical View of the Omnibus Law Establishing Employment Copyright Law</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rahman, Arif</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Zaini, Ahmad </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hajani, Hajani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Haerudin, Rendi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Jambunanda, Ahmad Jamaludin </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">constitutional transition</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">democratic state</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">omnibus law</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The debate regarding Omnibus Law as the main means for structuring legal regulations in Indonesia attracted a lot of public attention when the Omnibus Law method, which was previously little known in Indonesia as a country that adheres to the Continental European legal system, was used in the preparation of draft laws (RUU). How does the constitutional transition to the establishment of an omnibus law on copyright work in a democratic country? How do we review the constitutionality of the implementation of the Omnibus Law and the copyright mechanism in the formation of statutory regulations? This research uses the concept of normative descriptive research, or what can be called normative juridical research. With this method, law is interpreted as what is written in legislation (law in a book), or law is interpreted as a legal rule, which is a standard for appropriate behavior. The Omnibus Law method practiced in the common law system is interpreted as a (new) law that regulates various kinds of regulations to simplify the various laws that are still in force. Constitutionally, the legal position of the omnibus law concept has not been regulated in the legal system or in the laws and regulations in Indonesia. Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, which was formed using the Omnibus method, is considered to be constitutionally contradictory because it does not have clear objectives and formulation, both in terms of the standard of formation, the systematics of its creation, and the process of changing its substance.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-12-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/1552</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jllr.v5i4.1552</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Law and Legal Reform; Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): Contemporary Issues on Law Reform in Indonesia and Global Context; 1913-1940</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0968</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0941</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jllr.v5i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/1552/2942</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Arif Rahman, Ahmad  Zaini, Hajani Hajani, Rendi Haerudin, Ahmad Jamaludin  Jambunanda (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>