Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Measuring Vertical Integration in the Technology Sector: Indonesia, the US, and the EU in Unfair Competition

Journal of Law and Legal Reform · Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024) · hlm. 1697–1736

DOI
10.15294/jllr.v5i4.12437
ISSN
2715-0968, 2715-0941
Terbit
2024-12-15
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

On several occasions, Indonesian competition authorities have attempted to apply Article 14 to adjudicate violations related to vertical integration practices; however, these attempts were invalidated at the objection and cassation levels. The criteria utilized include the concepts of unfair business competition and public harm, as these terms are instrumental in determining the impacts of violations concerning vertical integration. This research aims to examine the legal approaches employed by Indonesian competition authorities in addressing vertical integration, with a particular focus on the technology sector. The findings indicate that the criteria for assessing whether vertical integration constitutes a violation of unfair business competition vary among Indonesia, the United States, and the European Union. In Indonesia, the emphasis is on preventing the exclusion of access to essential raw materials or significant buyers, utilizing the Rule of Reason approach. In contrast, the U.S. evaluates public detriment by balancing fairness and competitive benefits, whereas the EU focuses on market dominance and its potential to reduce competition. Despite these variations, all three jurisdictions share a common objective of enhancing consumer welfare and promoting competitive market conditions, with specific regard to differing regulations on online sales restrictions.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

34 penulis · 76 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 42 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Trisakti
  • State University of Gorontalo
  • Diponegoro University
  • Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia
  • Université Laval
  • University of Canterbury
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Jimi Rambo ArranchadoUniversity of Canterbury6
Nadzriah AhmadUniversiti Teknologi MARA2
Dian Adriawan Dg TawangUniversitas Trisakti2
Andrés Herrera EsquivelAnahuac Mayab University2
Verandha MayvaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sharda AbriantUniversitas Trisakti2
Rais Akbar RahmaUniversitas Trisakti2
Berto Mulia WibawaMonash University Malaysia2
Arif WicaksanaUniversitas Trisakti2
Sharda AbriantiUniversitas Trisakti2
Jimi Rambo ArranchadoeAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Januardo Sulung Partogi SihombingUniversitas Trisakti1
Intan Nevia CahyanaUniversitas Trisakti1
Narita AdityaningrumUniversitas Trisakti1
Jufryanto PuluhulawaState University of Gorontalo1
Vifi SwarianataState University of Gorontalo1
Pujiyono PujiyonoDiponegoro University1
Barda Nawawi AriefDiponegoro University1
Siti NurbaitiUniversitas Trisakti1
Agus Nanang IrnawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Irawati PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia ZuhraUniversitas Trisakti1
Elsi Kartika SariUniversitas Trisakti1
Ninuk WijiningsihUniversitas Trisakti1
Wahyuni RetnowulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maya Indrasti NotoprayitnoUniversitas Trisakti1
Setiyono SetiyonoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Dinda KeumalaUniversitas Trisakti1
Nadia NursantihUniversitas Trisakti1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Measuring Vertical Integration in the Technology Sector: Indonesia, the US, and the EU in Unfair Competition</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sabirin, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wangga, Maria Silvya Elisabeth </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Abrianti, Sharda</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fernandez, Serena Ortigosa </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Technology Sector</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Unfair Competition</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Vertical Integration</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">On several occasions, Indonesian competition authorities have attempted to apply Article 14 to adjudicate violations related to vertical integration practices; however, these attempts were invalidated at the objection and cassation levels. The criteria utilized include the concepts of unfair business competition and public harm, as these terms are instrumental in determining the impacts of violations concerning vertical integration. This research aims to examine the legal approaches employed by Indonesian competition authorities in addressing vertical integration, with a particular focus on the technology sector. The findings indicate that the criteria for assessing whether vertical integration constitutes a violation of unfair business competition vary among Indonesia, the United States, and the European Union. In Indonesia, the emphasis is on preventing the exclusion of access to essential raw materials or significant buyers, utilizing the Rule of Reason approach. In contrast, the U.S. evaluates public detriment by balancing fairness and competitive benefits, whereas the EU focuses on market dominance and its potential to reduce competition. Despite these variations, all three jurisdictions share a common objective of enhancing consumer welfare and promoting competitive market conditions, with specific regard to differing regulations on online sales restrictions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-12-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/12437</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jllr.v5i4.12437</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Law and Legal Reform; Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): Contemporary Issues on Law Reform in Indonesia and Global Context; 1697-1736</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0968</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0941</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jllr.v5i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/12437/2931</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Anna Maria Tri  Anggraini, Ahmad Sabirin, Maria Silvya Elisabeth  Wangga, Serena Ortigosa  Fernandez (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>