Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Benefit-Based Corruption Eradication Policy: A Comparison Between Indonesia and the UK

Journal of Law and Legal Reform · Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025) · hlm. 1685–1722

DOI
10.15294/jllr.v6i3.23406
ISSN
2715-0968, 2715-0941
Terbit
2025-07-31
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This research analyzes benefit-based corruption eradication policies in Indonesia and the UK while exploring the fundamental differences in anti-corruption strategies in the two countries and the possibility of implementing more effective policies in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative juridical with a literature study approach. The results indicate that Indonesia and the UK adhere to different approaches to combating corruption. The UK implements a system based on legal certainty, transparency, and strict accountability while instilling a culture of integrity in the government system and the private sector. In addition, the UK has an independent anti-corruption agency with strict regulations integrated into the national legal system. However, policies in Indonesia still face challenges in terms of law enforcement, independence of anti-corruption institutions, and transparency of state financial management. To improve the effectiveness of corruption eradication in Indonesia, this research recommends a policy reconstruction that draws on UK practice. This measure includes strengthening independent anti-corruption institutions, implementing a stricter transparency system, and integrating anti-corruption policies into all national regulations. Applying the principle of expediency in corruption eradication policies is expected to foster a more effective, accountable, and sustainable system in corruption eradication in Indonesia.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 101 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 12 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Jambi
  • Padjadjaran University
  • University of Cambridge
  • Monash University
  • Tsinghua University
  • Mulawarman University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Elly SudartiUniversitas Jambi8
Erwin ErwinUniversitas Jambi4
Dheny WahyudhiUniversitas Jambi3
Elis Teti RUSMIATIPadjadjaran University2
Aristo Evandy A. BarlianPadjadjaran University2
Atip LatipulhayatPadjadjaran University2
Khabib NawawiUniversitas Jambi2
Nys. ArfaUniversitas Jambi2
Yulia MonitaUniversitas Jambi2
Dessy RakhmawatiUniversitas Jambi2
Mohamad RapikUniversitas Jambi2
Marjan MiharjaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bob HassanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arif AwanggaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widati WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Angga Aldilla GusmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ammar Zul HaidarMonash University1
Moh Hasyim Asy'ariUniversitas Jambi1
Mutia Carolina FransicaTsinghua University1
Elly SudartyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Johni NajwanUniversitas Jambi1
M. Zulva AuliaUniversitas Jambi1
Harry Setya NugrahaMulawarman University1
Usman UsmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ell SudartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Herry LiyusUniversitas Jambi1
Erwin ErwinUniversitas Jambi1
Umar HasanUniversitas Jambi1
Sintia FebrianiUniversitas Jambi1
Ardi Saputra GuloUniversitas Jambi1
Elizabeth SiregarUniversitas Jambi1
Vani KurniaUniversitas Jambi1
Desi RatnasariUniversitas Jambi1
Nisa Nindia PutriUniversitas Jambi1
Nurholidah NurholidahUniversitas Jambi1
Silvy Amira FadiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Murniyanti MurniyantiUniversitas Jambi1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Benefit-Based Corruption Eradication Policy: A Comparison Between Indonesia and the UK</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Lasmadi, Sahuri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sukma, Ahmad Novindri Aji</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Benefit</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Corruption</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Eradication</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Policy </dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This research analyzes benefit-based corruption eradication policies in Indonesia and the UK while exploring the fundamental differences in anti-corruption strategies in the two countries and the possibility of implementing more effective policies in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative juridical with a literature study approach. The results indicate that Indonesia and the UK adhere to different approaches to combating corruption. The UK implements a system based on legal certainty, transparency, and strict accountability while instilling a culture of integrity in the government system and the private sector. In addition, the UK has an independent anti-corruption agency with strict regulations integrated into the national legal system. However, policies in Indonesia still face challenges in terms of law enforcement, independence of anti-corruption institutions, and transparency of state financial management. To improve the effectiveness of corruption eradication in Indonesia, this research recommends a policy reconstruction that draws on UK practice. This measure includes strengthening independent anti-corruption institutions, implementing a stricter transparency system, and integrating anti-corruption policies into all national regulations. Applying the principle of expediency in corruption eradication policies is expected to foster a more effective, accountable, and sustainable system in corruption eradication in Indonesia.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-07-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/23406</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jllr.v6i3.23406</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Law and Legal Reform; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025; 1685-1722</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0968</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0941</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jllr.v6i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/23406/5198</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Sahuri Lasmadi, Ahmad Novindri Aji Sukma (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>