Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Designing the Ideal E-Court E-Litigation: A Global Comparative Framework for Indonesia’s Electronic Civil Case Management System

Journal of Law and Legal Reform · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 675–716

DOI
10.15294/jllr.v7i2.41981
ISSN
2715-0968, 2715-0941
Terbit
2026-04-30
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Recent changes to the judiciary in Indonesia have introduced digitalization of the country’s judicial system, including e-courts and e-litigation, aimed at improving efficiency and transparency. However, with the technological infrastructure still facing many issues and the absence of legal standards for digital information and system privacy, these e-court and e-litigations have not been successful thus far. This paper examines the judiciary’s digital presence and the structure of e-court systems in other countries to devise an ideal model for Indonesia’s electronic civil case management systems. The research employed normative, doctrinal, and comparative legal methodologies, primarily drawing on statutes, case law, and secondary literature. This paper supports 1) SDGs No. 16 on Peace, Justice and Resilient Institutions strengthening inclusive and peaceful societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all, 2) The seventh Asta Cita, which emphasizes a transparent, efficient, and accountable judicial system that strengthens legal certainty, accelerates digital transformation, and enhances equitable access to justice throughout Indonesia. The study indicates that an ideal model exists, comprising five key features: the ability to file electronically, pay court filing and service fees electronically, receive electronically served summons, attend court proceedings via telecommunications, and continuously improve human resources and digital legal education. The comparative research has identified particular strengths in different jurisdictions, such as the Netherlands in data protection, Australia in system interoperability, Norway and Spain in efficient procedural and system cybersecurity, Singapore and Malaysia in legal technology education, and the United Kingdom in user-friendly system design. The results of this research are pivotal for legal reforms in Indonesia. It presents actionable steps to modernize the judiciary, improve access to justice, and bolster public trust in the judiciary in the digital era. Additionally, the study outlines policies to assist Indonesia in incorporating the optimal elements of the jurisdictions analyzed to establish a comprehensive, transparent, and legally sustainable e-court system. The research is constrained by the absence of an empirical analysis of court system readiness and of the relatively shallow analysis of the developed technical system.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 131 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ridwan ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Waspiah WaspiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Rodiyah RodiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Anis WidyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dewi Zahra SetyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Veyza OliviaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Armanda N ArdiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Qlarissa MelindaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hisyam Maliki AkbarAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ahmad HabiburrahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rahmawati Melati SaniState University of Semarang3
Choirul FuadAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Seni Ira Maya RasidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Fitria DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rizqiya Lailatul IzzaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Indriana FirdausAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dede Alvin SetiajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Moh. Imam GusthomiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Adymas Hikal FikriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad Habib Al FikryAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Kartika Fajar CahyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
R Benny RiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nurul FibriantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suhadi SuhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang1
Adinda Ratna PertiwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anita Indah WidiastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adelia Setya AyuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dyah MayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nisma Raditya ArbayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anisa Endah Dwi SafitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ubaidillah KamalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
TRI ANDARI DAHLANAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Risky Agung FirnandaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aldina UlyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Designing the Ideal E-Court E-Litigation: A Global Comparative Framework for Indonesia’s Electronic Civil Case Management System</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Latifiani, Dian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Baidhowi, Baidhowi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Novita, Yustina Dhian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nugraha, Nur Arif</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">E-Court</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">The Sevent Asta Cita of the President of the Republic of Indonesia</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Digital Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">SDG  16</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Judicial Reform</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Recent changes to the judiciary in Indonesia have introduced digitalization of the country’s judicial system, including e-courts and e-litigation, aimed at improving efficiency and transparency. However, with the technological infrastructure still facing many issues and the absence of legal standards for digital information and system privacy, these e-court and e-litigations have not been successful thus far. This paper examines the judiciary’s digital presence and the structure of e-court systems in other countries to devise an ideal model for Indonesia’s electronic civil case management systems. The research employed normative, doctrinal, and comparative legal methodologies, primarily drawing on statutes, case law, and secondary literature. This paper supports 1) SDGs No. 16 on Peace, Justice and Resilient Institutions strengthening inclusive and peaceful societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all, 2) The seventh Asta Cita, which emphasizes a transparent, efficient, and accountable judicial system that strengthens legal certainty, accelerates digital transformation, and enhances equitable access to justice throughout Indonesia. The study indicates that an ideal model exists, comprising five key features: the ability to file electronically, pay court filing and service fees electronically, receive electronically served summons, attend court proceedings via telecommunications, and continuously improve human resources and digital legal education. The comparative research has identified particular strengths in different jurisdictions, such as the Netherlands in data protection, Australia in system interoperability, Norway and Spain in efficient procedural and system cybersecurity, Singapore and Malaysia in legal technology education, and the United Kingdom in user-friendly system design. The results of this research are pivotal for legal reforms in Indonesia. It presents actionable steps to modernize the judiciary, improve access to justice, and bolster public trust in the judiciary in the digital era. Additionally, the study outlines policies to assist Indonesia in incorporating the optimal elements of the jurisdictions analyzed to establish a comprehensive, transparent, and legally sustainable e-court system. The research is constrained by the absence of an empirical analysis of court system readiness and of the relatively shallow analysis of the developed technical system.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/41981</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jllr.v7i2.41981</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Law and Legal Reform; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April, 2026; 675-716</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0968</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0941</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jllr.v7i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jllr/article/view/41981/9867</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Dian Latifiani, Baidhowi Baidhowi, Yustina Dhian Novita, Nur Arif Nugraha (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>